• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Smash Wii U/3DS: 3 Character Slots & 3 Stage Slots Found in Recent Patch Data (1.1.1)

Status
Not open for further replies.

BatDan

Bane? Get them on board, I'll call it in.
This

ryat6gw.jpg

So THIS is the Half-Life 3 confirmation we've been looking for.
 
K.Rool being in that leak basically proves it's full of shit.

They placated a very loud minority on the internet by making it a Mii outfit, they're not going to waste a character slot on an ugly villain character that hasn't even featured in the last two main DK entries.

5PLxQcf.gif
 

kunonabi

Member
Do people actually believe Nintendo would go to the trouble of making a deal with Konami and then not get Snake back? The only way I could ever see that happening is if Konami was for some reason firmly against Snake returning while at the same time okay with Nintendo licensing their other IP. Which sounds ridiculous.

If Snake tags along fine, but if Konami is only getting one character in Smash then Simon, Bomberman, and even Goemon all deserve the spot more. Capcom has two characters so getting Simon and Snake isn't all that outrageous a thought now.
 
Xenoblade and Xenoblade Chronicles X?

Isaac isn't only assist trophy that got cut.

I phrased that poorly, really, but I meant more in the handheld space - where that's always been Pokemon (which is a different beast), FE, GS. Seems GS is the dead one, sadly. Alas.

And, sure, you're right. The Excitebikes, Resetti etc got cut... though I will say the difference between a lot of the ones that got cut and Isaac is I always felt his trophy was one of the better ones (whereas Resetti was just a pain in the ass annoyance, etc), and he's a character with a moveset that'd work.

Alas. I'm just being salty because in my heart of hearts I know we're probably going to get wolf and he's going to be a clone right down the landmaster again (which irritates me even with Falco given that in their own damn lore he refuses to drive one). Knuckles or K. Rool would make up for that, though.
 
I would assume a scenario where Bomberman was dlc and Snake didn't come back would be to the cost of licensing the character, or Konami just being tighter with it's own original IP and not as tight with it's acquired IP from Hudson.
 

Arkeband

Banned
If Snake tags along fine, but if Konami is only getting one character in Smash then Simon, Bomberman, and even Goemon all deserve the spot more. Capcom has two characters so getting Simon and Snake isn't all that outrageous a thought now.

Goemon hasn't had a "real" entry in its IP since a Japan-only DS game from 2005, and doesn't have any future titles planned.

Snake is a SSB veteran, there's no contest here.
 

lamaroo

Unconfirmed Member
I just want them to add the ability to disable stage hazards. It shouldn't just be an all-or-nothing thing. I like the layout of certain stages, but the hazards just ruin them a lot of the time. Also I would love the ability to lock stages that change over the course of a match to one of its forms for good.
 
Goemon hasn't had a "real" entry in its IP since a Japan-only DS game from 2005, and doesn't have any future titles planned.

Snake is a SSB veteran, there's no contest here.

Not to mention, Metal Gear Solid is a more popular and important franchise than Castlevania, Goemon and Bomberman combined.

I mean, really, Goemon deserves it more than Snake? An obscure character from an inactive game series vs. a notable gaming icon with games still coming out to this day?
 
Not to mention, Metal Gear Solid is a more popular and important franchise than Castlevania, Goemon and Bomberman combined.

I mean, really, Goemon deserves it more than Snake? An obscure character from an inactive game series vs. a notable gaming icon with games still coming out to this day?

Snake icon status is almost entirely associated with Sony though. It's not even comparable to Ryu, who had one of his most notable roles on a Nintendo platform. Snake's popularity has pretty much nothing to do with the Nintendo games he's been on, and he isn't even coming to Nintendo platforms anymore. In my mind, what's important about a third party isn't there icon status so much as there relevance to Nintendo and it's history. That's why I think an indie rep is more deserving than Snake. Indies are a huge part of Nintendo's current strategy, so while no individual indie is a huge icon (by the nature of being indie), they play an important role in Nintendo's history. Snake really doesn't IMO
 

mStudios

Member
How can a game like Smash Bros go from Excellence to shittties-game-ever-made in a matter of minutes?

Simple, by adding King K. Rool.
 
So the same person also is saying Shovel Knight? So thats four characters?

Two of these slots were there since the April update, so two are before the ballot.

Lucky guesss, and I'd be ok with it, but I highly doubt a Konami character would get in and not being Snake. Sure, two could get in but thats not what this is saying, unless Nintendo bought Bomberman. Plus "Sakurai wouldn't want Snake due to Konami and Kojima BS"? Then why would he want to work with the company that fired his friend on a different character? Doesn't add up. Sure anything possible, but even I don't believe something that crazy could happen. (Unless Nintendo DID buy Bomberman...)

#Quotingapostthreepageslate
 

21XX

Banned
Question -- is the placeholder data in the patch an indication that these may be coming sooner rather than later? Or does it not really have a bearing?
 
Alas. I'm just being salty because in my heart of hearts I know we're probably going to get wolf and he's going to be a clone right down the landmaster again (which irritates me even with Falco given that in their own damn lore he refuses to drive one). Knuckles or K. Rool would make up for that, though.

A clone again? When was Wolf a clone the first time?
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Question -- is the placeholder data in the patch an indication that these may be coming sooner rather than later? Or does it not really have a bearing?
Roy & Ryu's data were in Mewtwo's update & came out in the following update. If this is any indication, we may see these 3 characters as soon as the next update. However, since we just got an update, I wouldn't expect the next one until sometime in November.
 
How can a game like Smash Bros go from Excellence to shittties-game-ever-made in a matter of minutes?

Simple, by adding King K. Rool.

You know people who post vitriol like this think that they are being totes hilarious and subversive about a popular character

They are not

They are just being jack asses.
 

Arkeband

Banned
Snake icon status is almost entirely associated with Sony though. It's not even comparable to Ryu, who had one of his most notable roles on a Nintendo platform. Snake's popularity has pretty much nothing to do with the Nintendo games he's been on, and he isn't even coming to Nintendo platforms anymore. In my mind, what's important about a third party isn't there icon status so much as there relevance to Nintendo and it's history. That's why I think an indie rep is more deserving than Snake. Indies are a huge part of Nintendo's current strategy, so while no individual indie is a huge icon (by the nature of being indie), they play an important role in Nintendo's history. Snake really doesn't IMO

Nintendo's current strategy is pray Mario Maker keeps selling until their stock goes up when they announce NX details.

Snake's popularity or affiliation with Nintendo is an outlier, they decided to put him into the series on Sakurai's whom and now he has a coveted veteran spot. We aren't far enough into the franchise for it to be too overstuffed, so you can expect all previous fighters to make it in eventually.
 

Boss Doggie

all my loli wolf companions are so moe
Yeah, people kept on listing Snake's involvement in Nintendo when the matter of fact is he got in because Kojima asked Sakurai. Nothing more or less.

Since I only gave a throwaway response to your other comments I'll take this bait:

Why do you keep bringing up ROB? Are you misunderstanding what he is?

He is not some unrelated thing that eventually got used with a game after it became popular. He is a peripheral that was deliberately designed for use with the NES in order to make the system seem more appealing to retailers after the Atari video game crash. He has no other purpose, he can't be used with anything other than his two NES games, his origins are unmistakably linked with video games - which, as far as I know, is basically Sakurai's only justification for a character in order to keep Smash from being a totally random crossover. This is not remotely equivalent to a synthesizer mascot who later starred in video games after becoming popular from her other, non-video game-related ventures. Any attempt to link the two in order to claim "they're both not from a video game, but later got used in them!" is just desperately clinging to semantics in order to justify your off-the-wall character choice.

And the suggestion that the synthesizer technology she uses has become its own "niche genre" is BS because "one specific set of games starring Miku" is not a genre. That's like calling Mario or Pokemon its own genre. No, they're platformers and RPGs. Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know there aren't any rhythm games on the market using Vocaloid technology as a major focus that aren't SEGA-made Vocaloid games.

You can try to jump through hoops and move that goalpost as much as you want, but these are actual, provable facts.

I use ROB because of the "they're not video game characters at all and are only partially related due to their involvement" - their origins, not whether Sakurai picks them. You bring up ROB's origin, which solidifies my point that he is in fact not a character but a peripheral. You keep bringing up Nintendo but that wasn't why I bring up ROB to begin with - I am simply stating the similarities of their origin, not the "chances" or shit.

She is a persona of a synthesizer that is later used in video games. She pioneered the "vocaloid" phenomena which IS a niche similar to that of VNs. She might not have started it, but like Doronbo Gang she made it big.

And likewise, if you read my posts, I don't think she will get in, but I am laughing at the fact that people rank her quite low as though she is a cartoon character, using arguments that sound like hypocritical which I tackled. And even then Sakurai never made big rules.

Also I'm not moving goalposts. I'm just sitting here looking at all the gymnastics show because I just corrected the assumption on Miku's place.

Alas. I'm just being salty because in my heart of hearts I know we're probably going to get wolf and he's going to be a clone right down the landmaster again (which irritates me even with Falco given that in their own damn lore he refuses to drive one). Knuckles or K. Rool would make up for that, though.

But Wolf's not a clone.
 
I'd be cool with Miku in Smash but I honestly don't see it happening, even in her Mirai version. One day I'd love a straight answer from Sakurai on why Snake didn't return in Smash 4 as it would help to quell conversation about the character in all future Smash DLC/game discussion
 

Arkeband

Banned
Yeah, people kept on listing Snake's involvement in Nintendo when the matter of fact is he got in because Kojima asked Sakurai. Nothing more or less.



I use ROB because of the "they're not video game characters at all and are only partially related due to their involvement" - their origins, not whether Sakurai picks them. You bring up ROB's origin, which solidifies my point that he is in fact not a character but a peripheral. You keep bringing up Nintendo but that wasn't why I bring up ROB to begin with - I am simply stating the similarities of their origin, not the "chances" or shit.

She is a persona of a synthesizer that is later used in video games. She pioneered the "vocaloid" phenomena which IS a niche similar to that of VNs. She might not have started it, but like Doronbo Gang she made it big.

And likewise, if you read my posts, I don't think she will get in, but I am laughing at the fact that people rank her quite low as though she is a cartoon character, using arguments that sound like hypocritical which I tackled. And even then Sakurai never made big rules.

Also I'm not moving goalposts. I'm just sitting here looking at all the gymnastics show because I just corrected the assumption on Miku's place.



But Wolf's not a clone.

You're right, it's not impossible for them to include Miku.

I'd put her odds somewhere around Riddick, or maybe Harry Potter.

Edit: oh, and Coachella Hologram Tupac.
 

Camjo-Z

Member
I use ROB because of the "they're not video game characters at all and are only partially related due to their involvement" - their origins, not whether Sakurai picks them. You bring up ROB's origin, which solidifies my point that he is in fact not a character but a peripheral. You keep bringing up Nintendo but that wasn't why I bring up ROB to begin with - I am simply stating the similarities of their origin, not the "chances" or shit.

There are no similarities in their origin. "Origin" means their start, their beginning. One was created with gaming in mind and one was not. Whatever happened with Miku later does not count as an "origin".

She is a persona of a synthesizer that is later used in video games. She pioneered the "vocaloid" phenomena which IS a niche similar to that of VNs.

What is this phenomena? You keep saying "later used in video games" but can I have some examples that aren't just games based on the Vocaloid franchise? How is this any different from a character like Popeye or Mickey Mouse that started in one medium but eventually got their own games?
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Yes, weird coincidence, that's what it was.
Yeah, said Shovel Knight Amiibo is completely separate from the Smash line, & isn't even made by Nintendo. Plus Tamaki already said numerous times that the SK Amiibo was separate from his Smash rumor (even before said Amiibo leaked).
 
A clone again? When was Wolf a clone the first time?

Semantics, obviously; Ryu and Sakura aren't clones either, but ultimately Wolf had a version of the reflector, a version of the dash, a version of the Fire Fox, a version of the blaster, the Landmaster, and similar-but-tweaked normals. He's no model swap, obviously - there's a lot different to him, and he plays differently - but he's in that same archetype with that same base set of moves conceptually, they just function differently across the three of them, and three is, IMO, one too many. So, I use clone broadly - I wouldn't want a third version of Link either, I've always thought the people who've asked for Young Link back as well as Toon Link to be nutcases for the same reason. Regardless, as far as Wolf goes, I'm actually fairly okay with most of the former (though I'd love to see some more moves outright replaced with an entirely new thing with radically different properties) but the Landmaster has always struck me as a shitty move on all levels. Starfox doesn't have much lore, but Wolf and Falco both deserved their own unique FS for their own unique personalities and backgrounds.

Then again -- I've always felt wolf, as a third reflector/blaster/dash character, was a mis-step. I'm no fan of the character, but if they wanted another Starfox character it always should've been Krystal, with the Staff from Adventures (which originally belonged to her before Fox gets it) & moves inspired by the magic powers in that game. That'd be something entirely new and different - Zelda-esque magic, and a staff, which'd be a nice change from the sea of sword users as far as close quarters weapons go, but alas. We did at least get a staff user of a sort in Smash 4 with Palutena at any rate.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Semantics, obviously; Ryu and Sakura aren't clones either, but ultimately Wolf had a version of the reflector, a version of the dash, a version of the Fire Fox, a version of the blaster, the Landmaster, and similar-but-tweaked normals. He's no model swap, obviously - there's a lot different to him, and he plays differently - but he's in that same archetype with that same base set of moves conceptually, they just function differently across the three of them, and three is, IMO, one too many. Regardless, I'm actually fairly okay with most of the former (though I'd love to see some more moves outright replaced with an entirely new thing with radically different properties) but the Landmaster has always struck me as a shitty move on all levels. Starfox doesn't have much lore, but Wolf and Falco both deserved their own unique FS for their own unique personalities and backgrounds.

Then again -- I've always felt wolf, as a third reflector/blaster/dash character, was a mis-step. I'm no fan of the character, but if they wanted another Starfox character it always should've been Krystal, with the Staff from Adventures (which originally belonged to her before Fox gets it) & moves inspired by the magic powers in that game. That'd be something entirely new and different, but alas. We did at least get a staff user of a sort in Smash 4 with Palutena at any rate.
Judging by the fact that Krystal is no longer canon in Star Fox Zero, Nintendo may be moving away from her as a whole.
 

Kinsei

Banned
I'm guessing Wolf and two newcomers with at least one of those newcomers being a first party character. I can't see them adding in two or more new third party characters as DLC without adding in at least one first party newcomer as DLC.
 
Judging by the fact that Krystal is no longer canon in Star Fox Zero, Nintendo may be moving away from her as a whole.

Sure, but I'm talking there from the perspective of Brawl, when they picked Wolf, which was coming off the back of a game where she was a major character, to be fair. I understand why they'd bring Wolf back now; he's already half-done in a sense, anyway. I just lament he's not more different.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
What do you mean? I'm confused. Wouldn't that make it an interquel? Do you have a link to this?
I think APZonerunner explained it better.
Sure, but I'm talking there from the perspective of Brawl, when they picked Wolf, which was coming off the back of a game where she was a major character, to be fair. I understand why they'd bring Wolf back now; he's already half-done in a sense, anyway. I just lament he's not more different.

Zero's a weird place, as it's a complete 'reimagining' of the series (though Nintendo has repeatedly warned press off describing it as a reboot), so it's basically a remake of Starfox 64/Starfox again, so, yeah, she's gone.
 
Wolf was added to Brawl instead of Krystal because Wolf was popular and easier to implement in the short amount of time they had to add him.

Question: Why did Wolf become a playable fighter, and not Krystal?

Sakurai: Wolf was a character that barely made it in due to time constraints. He was added because there was high demand for his inclusion on places like “Smash Bros. Dojo!!”, and he’s a popular character. Of course, if he didn’t have that backing him, I don’t think I could have put him in. Among the characters with high popularity, I chose one who had a high possibility of becoming realized in the game, and as a result you could say Wolf was created.

For Krystal, we didn’t have any of the technical modeling knowledge that we had cultivated with Fox and Falco, so it was like making a brand-new character from scratch. And because of the limited amount of time we had, creating Krystal wasn’t realistically possible. On that point, with Wolf we already have some knowledge of how to model his character, and would require about 70% of the effort required to create a whole new character.
 
If I recall, Nintendo turned back the clock on Star Fox canon for Zero. Who knows, maybe they'll change their minds & reintroduce her in a later Star Fox game.

What do you mean? I'm confused. Wouldn't that make it an interquel? Do you have a link to this?

Star Fox Zero is in a weird place, as it's a complete 're-imagining' of the series (though Nintendo has repeatedly warned press off describing it as a reboot - at E3 PR kept hammering this into us, 'it isn't a reboot, it's a re-imagining', describe it as such), so it's basically a remake of Starfox 64/Starfox again from a fresh perspective, so, yeah, she's gone, Peppy is back in an Arwing, the Panther dude is gone from Star Wolf, Pigma is alive again, etc.

It is essentially a different take on the 'core' Starfox story, which is what Starfox 64 is (it isn't a sequel to Starfox, more the same story again with new wrinkles).



Yeah, which was all I meant in describing him as a 'clone'. I know of course he doesn't play identically, but the way his move-set is constructed is very similar, and ultimately he was chosen because he was easy to do. Which, in a sense, makes him being a DLC slot a little tougher to swallow, but I'll buy it anyway; I'll always support Smash.
 

kunonabi

Member
Not to mention, Metal Gear Solid is a more popular and important franchise than Castlevania, Goemon and Bomberman combined.

I mean, really, Goemon deserves it more than Snake? An obscure character from an inactive game series vs. a notable gaming icon with games still coming out to this day?


Castlevania is a far more important franchise than MGS when it comes to Nintendo's legacy. There is so much there in terms of stages, assist trophies, and music that would elevate Smash than what Snake brings to the table.

Didn't Goemon rank pretty highly in one of the Japanese polls? The vast majority of his titles are with Nintendo and he isn't any more or less dead on Nintendo platforms than Snake is at this point who is far more distinctly tied to Sony platforms and even the MSX in comparison to Nintendo.

Despite Konami owning him, Bomberman would represent Hudson who certainly deserves some recognition, If Ryu can get in to pay tribute to the series that defined fighting games then Bomberman can get in for being the face of franchise that was pretty much a cornerstone of local multiplayer.
 
I think APZonerunner explained it better.
So basically it's going to be the same plot as Starfox 64, as it's just the same story from a different angle. That has nothing to do with what comes next. They also specifically said its not a reboot, so the old canon is still valid. Unless they explicitly say it's no longer canon, it's still canon.

But since she's not in this upcoming reimagining, she doesn't have a purpose of being in this Smash game to promote something. But that still doesn't mean the other games are no longer canon.
 
Didn't Goemon rank pretty highly in one of the Japanese polls? The vast majority of his titles are with Nintendo and he isn't any more or less dead on Nintendo platforms than Snake is at this point who is far more distinctly tied to Sony platforms and even the MSX in comparison to Nintendo.

Snake Eater 3D came out many years after the last Goemon game.

The rest of your points are moot anyway. Snake will sel DLC, Goemon will not. I love Mystical Ninja 64 but it's true. Plus Snake is basically already done, so...
 
Castlevania is a far more important franchise than MGS when it comes to Nintendo's legacy. There is so much there in terms of stages, assist trophies, and music that would elevate Smash than what Snake brings to the table.

Didn't Goemon rank pretty highly in one of the Japanese polls? The vast majority of his titles are with Nintendo and he isn't any more or less dead on Nintendo platforms than Snake is at this point who is far more distinctly tied to Sony platforms and even the MSX in comparison to Nintendo.

Despite Konami owning him, Bomberman would represent Hudson who certainly deserves some recognition, If Ryu can get in to pay tribute to the series that defined fighting games then Bomberman can get in for being the face of franchise that was pretty much a cornerstone of local multiplayer.

I'm talking about gaming in general, and in that regard Metal Gear has Castlevania beat. Even if the latter is more associated with Nintendo, the former has probably made a bigger impact in gaming history, and I'd say that's what matters.

I don't know anything about Goemon ranking high on polls, and it really doesn't matter. He is nowhere near the level of Sonic, Ryu, Pac-Man and even Snake. Also, I don't think Bomberman is as huge a character as people think he is. He was just the mascot of a minor (and defunct) game company back in the 90s, and I can't really think of what makes him such a heavy hitter like the other third parties in Smash. I'm pretty sure games like Mario Kart had it beat in terms of being "a cornerstone of local multiplayer".
 

Ivan 3414

Member
Do people really think Inklings are happening? Just simply because of their ink mechanics I don't think they'll be playable here; seems like they'd have to put in way more work than most DLC characters.

I think it would use a lot of processing power to make the ink mechanics faithful to Splatoon(ink reacting to and staying on terrain), and if the Wii U can handle it, the 3DS certainly can't. Seems like a character they need way more time to add, to the point that they'd be better off waiting til the next Smash.
 

Boss Doggie

all my loli wolf companions are so moe
You're right, it's not impossible for them to include Miku.

I'd put her odds somewhere around Riddick, or maybe Harry Potter.

Edit: oh, and Coachella Hologram Tupac.

Nah more like Segata Sanshiro actually.
Yes I know he got a game near the end of Saturn, but his proper goal is an advertising material.

There are no similarities in their origin. "Origin" means their start, their beginning. One was created with gaming in mind and one was not. Whatever happened with Miku later does not count as an "origin".

What is this phenomena? You keep saying "later used in video games" but can I have some examples that aren't just games based on the Vocaloid franchise? How is this any different from a character like Popeye or Mickey Mouse that started in one medium but eventually got their own games?

Origin in terms of the program, not the persona. The program was used in video games (iirc even in stuff like Quake).

The vocaloids never left their stuff, they remained as they are outside of "live" concerts. They exist in the software.

Yeah, which was all I meant in describing him as a 'clone'. I know of course he doesn't play identically, but the way his move-set is constructed is very similar, and ultimately he was chosen because he was easy to do. Which, in a sense, makes him being a DLC slot a little tougher to swallow, but I'll buy it anyway; I'll always support Smash.

Uh no, that doesn't make him a clone.

He was easier to implement because they are more familiar with Wolf's look. Remember they already did him in Melee. In fact, if you notice, that actually freed them enough time that they designed him quite differently in looks

Semantics, obviously; Ryu and Sakura aren't clones either, but ultimately Wolf had a version of the reflector, a version of the dash, a version of the Fire Fox, a version of the blaster, the Landmaster, and similar-but-tweaked normals. He's no model swap, obviously - there's a lot different to him, and he plays differently - but he's in that same archetype with that same base set of moves conceptually, they just function differently across the three of them, and three is, IMO, one too many. So, I use clone broadly - I wouldn't want a third version of Link either, I've always thought the people who've asked for Young Link back as well as Toon Link to be nutcases for the same reason. Regardless, as far as Wolf goes, I'm actually fairly okay with most of the former (though I'd love to see some more moves outright replaced with an entirely new thing with radically different properties) but the Landmaster has always struck me as a shitty move on all levels. Starfox doesn't have much lore, but Wolf and Falco both deserved their own unique FS for their own unique personalities and backgrounds.

Then again -- I've always felt wolf, as a third reflector/blaster/dash character, was a mis-step. I'm no fan of the character, but if they wanted another Starfox character it always should've been Krystal, with the Staff from Adventures (which originally belonged to her before Fox gets it) & moves inspired by the magic powers in that game. That'd be something entirely new and different - Zelda-esque magic, and a staff, which'd be a nice change from the sea of sword users as far as close quarters weapons go, but alas. We did at least get a staff user of a sort in Smash 4 with Palutena at any rate.

Uh no. Those aren't just "tweaked" moves. This is where I draw the line.

You can say that for some of his specials/FS (and I disagree, the only truly tweaked stuff is his Final Smash, the rest are no more different than saying "Link's arrow shot is the same as Mario's fireballs because they are projectiles), but his normals? Fuck no.

Those aren't tweaked normals. They are their own animation. They have their own attributes. Saying they are tweaked is stupid, as that's just saying Marth's forward smash is a tweaked Link forward smash.

People thoroughly analyzed the character and outside of miscellaneous animations (which many characters share anyway), he is unique. So what if he shares an archetype? I guess that makes Ryu a Mario clone then because they share the same archetype? Is Shulk a Marth clone too because most of his specials are derivatives of the typical sword users? Wouldn't surprise me when people also said Ike was a clone back then.

And to counter this staff bullshit, look no further than Ganondorf. And just to spite, nearly all of the Adventure spells can be modified to look like the Star Fox archetype moves.

And you know what, Wolf may not have a staff, but he is quite distinct. Go tell me in front of my face that Fox and Falco fight like a feral beastman. Krystal won't give me the thrill of fighting like a wild animal who rends his enemies with his claws or fangs with touches similar of Jon Talbain.
 
They made a FMV model of Wolf in Melee that you see for a split-second. Sakurai stated they made Wolf because he was built off of a similar framework as Fox.

EDIT: And holy shit, stop with the Miku garbage.
 

PtM

Banned
If Wolf makes it back, I hope he does with a new outfit that doesn't look like something out of a 80's sci-fi movie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom