Lol and what would those be..?For the record, we don't know if there were conditions on the deal that PlayStation refuted.
Lol and what would those be..?
I mean, on the opposite side, what do they lose here too? Being the market leader and being the only platform refusing it for a game as big as Minecraft can't possibly look good either.
I'm amazed Nintendo said yes.
Oldie but still relevant.
https://www.polygon.com/2013/10/14/4838864/nintendo-allows-cross-play-for-pure-chess-ripstone-says
"...They said, 'Yep, no problem. You can have other console players playing against Wii U players. You can have smartphone players play against them. No problem,'" Gaskell told Eurogamer. "We're still talking to Sony about them relaxing their policies, but we don't think they'll have any issue with it. So when we launch Pure Chess, you'll be able to play against Wii U, 3DS, iOS and Android players.
Pure Chess never got crossplay on Sony platforms though and it even debuted on Vita and PS3 first.
Agreed, but, would appreciate a comment from either company involved rather than "tweet from dude." Surely the story is longer than that.
MS: hey Sony we're offering you cross play on Minecraft but you have to lick a turd.
Sony: ew no, not doing that.
MS: hey everyone Sony refused cross play, how arrogant *trollface*
We don't know the deal, ease up on the vitriol
Didn't they say at some point it was a security issue for them?
Wouldn't that be because of all the modding you can do in that version?java refused as well.
Business logistics, not arrogance.
Same here, I'd like to know why to be honest.That's pretty fucking lame to be honest. I don't care about Minecraft, but there is zero reason to deny the players to play with each other.
I'd say this
If MS were in the market leader spot they wouldn't be heavily chasing cross platform play. They are doing it because it takes away a competitive advantage of userbase
Business logistics, not arrogance.
Did someone from EA actually say this?
I mean, on the opposite side, what do they lose here too? Being the market leader and being the only platform refusing it for a game as big as Minecraft can't possibly look good either.
Insecurity.
A kingdom built on hubris cannot stand for long.
Yea let's have an outrage for something most of u won't even care about or even play lol
Yea let's have an outrage for something most of u won't even care about or even play lol
guys maybe sony is actually the hero here?? giving us fewer people to play with is a blessing now i know when i meet someone online that they are a winner who chose the winner console
Oh great. Another faux outrage thread like the BC one.
For the record, we don't know if there were conditions on the deal that PlayStation refuted.
I think at this point, Nintendo needs Minecraft more than Sony does.
This also might have been part of the deal to get Minecraft on the Switch to begin with.
that's.. arroganceBusiness logistics, not arrogance.
"dude" from tweet works for MS
yes that's exactly what happened whoa
are you an insider?
on a sidenote nintendo and apple lick turds lmao
guys maybe sony is actually the hero here?? giving us fewer people to play with is a blessing now i know when i meet someone online that they are a winner who chose the winner console
Yea let's have an outrage for something most of u won't even care about or even play lol
Yea let's have an outrage for something most of u won't even care about or even play lol
Yea let's have an outrage for something most of u won't even care about or even play lol