the box office is going to dictated if some movies are successful or not.
What are you measuring quality by? Critic reviews?
.
Definitely.
But they went in the most unappealing direction possible with this realistic style.
Do kids even like these? Are little kids asking their moms for plushies of photorealistic fishes?
"OMG just what I wanted for Christmas"
.
Man, everything Disney touches turns to shit.
Halle Bailey is beautiful!
Sure, when it is a new IP or obscure hero.
there are examples of established IP flopping.
I'm not sure this is true. I believe that percentage is for the global population as a whole but it is not uniform among different ethnicities.
That's some bad faith. Please don't do that to other people, and don't accept when they do it to you. That's just insulting. This post reminds me of how people can't criticize the complete removal of nearly all female sexualization in many modernized versions of longstanding game franchises without someone chiming in that they should just go to pornhub if that's what they want.
and you keep talking about the "quality".
Your continued strawman arguments and goalpost moving is getting tiring. It is clear you just want to troll.
nope.
well, i will be praying for your sanity this movie flops.
Peter Pan would be on that list of well beloved movie as well and yet, straight to streaming. Same with Pinocchio.
You are trying too hard to move goalposts and playing the ignorance card, mate.
Strange World may be loosely based on the IP of :"Journey to the Center of the Earth", but it isn't some well beloved and nearly universally celebrated franchise like Lion King, Little Mermaid, or other major live action remakes. Similar can be said for "Lone Ranger" and "John Carter". Yes, they are based on "established IPs", but trying to conflate them as being on the same level as Little Mermaid, Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, Beauty and hte Beast, and others? Get real.
Lightyear is the closest thing to an established IP with large amounts of fans that "flopped" recently, and that could be argued that it had very little to do with the actual IP it was based on.
Weird thing to post from an mainstream media outlet as promotion.
Wow, stop shaming the chad, ok?
Halle Bailey is beautiful!
Weird thing to post from an mainstream media outlet as promotion.
or if they will just ignore it. It's obvious enough the attempt to diversity within what are typically family stories by having a ridonculous number of interracial families in Hollywood but this is just a whole nuther level.NGL, the mermaid from the netflix series "Invisible City" got me tingling. There is something oddly sexual about the whole concept but I'm not really sure why. I've dove with manatees (which have got to be the origin of the mermaid myth, right?) and didn't feel the need to bang any of them
Who knows.Definitely.
But they went in the most unappealing direction possible with this realistic style.
Do kids even like these? Are little kids asking their moms for plushies of photorealistic fishes?
So, how you doin'?
Whats so great about her? You're defending her using glammed up pics with nice hair, make up and a gown?
Hey man, if thats what you find good looking then you be you brother, but she's average. All women have tits and asses. That shit dont make you look pretty.
What I find crazy is DeafT saying he found non-doctored pics and he uploads Hollywood glamour shots. Ok, perhaps not doctored in a Photoshop changing way, but that's like saying half the women at weddings are hot. Ya, when every guy and gal at a wedding dresses up, shaves and does their hair, of course they look better than sitting on the couch or doing a webcam video (like the one I posted) which is someone just in their normal look.
She a baddie and I wouldn't say no.Halle Bailey is beautiful!
