• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

No Man's Sky has the 5th largest peak player count on Steam (by game) since 2012

dracula_x

Member
hm, interesting

Elite Dangerous

tsFhLRH.png


NMS

TDB18Fm.png
 
There isnt enough space on the internet to explain whats wrong with me.

Game locks up my PC so...its the worst game I ever bought. Not sure what else to say.

Sean knew the game sucked on PC and released it anyway to make the $$$. Shame on him.

I wonder if your tune would be the same if it was PS4 Exclusive and never coming to PC...
 
I wonder if your tune would be the same if it was PS4 Exclusive and never coming to PC...

I'd have preferred that to be honest. I have all the consoles, though having a high end PC usually means its always best to buy that format for a multiplat game.

If the PC version wasnt up to spec then just delay x months.

I was anticipating this game a ton, so I would have bought the PS4 version to play and likely been happy with it.
 
Pretty impressive. Imagine if the game was actually good. They'd have a huge success on their hands.

I'm not holding my breath for patches to improve much. They've been patching Ark forever now and the same issues still exist since day 1.
 
You didn't get the message, did you?

People (NA folks) are going to bed at these hours, and it shows from the Dota 2 charts.

Just messing around. I was anticipating this game so much, so to not be able to even play it ... sucks. If the PC version isnt up to scratch just delay it, I would have been fine buying the PS4 version if that was the only one available any time soon. Feels weird that this was one of my most anticipated games of the year and I cant even play it.
 
Hmmm, as usual the steam reviews are mostly shit. I was looking for a good funny one but it's mostly either crash complaints or technical issues, which are all valid btw.

But this one in particular
" Their 18 quinquillion planets are just a bunch of re-color of the same assets, randomly generated with different combinations. Their representation of the universe is inaccurate, every single planet is inhabited with life and/or vegetation, there are no gas giants, no ring systems, no barren worlds, no actual moons, and no variation of star types. But i'm not here to talk about that stuff you can easily confirm by watching some gameplay. "

Just a small section. But he only had 3 hours played. And it's got 1600/2100~ people marking it as helpful. I just don't see how a review with that short engagement time is ever going to be helpful.

I guess some people make up their minds that quick though, and I won't say that is wrong.
 
I'd have preferred that to be honest. I have all the consoles, though having a high end PC usually means its always best to buy that format for a multiplat game.

If the PC version wasnt up to spec then just delay x months.

I was anticipating this game a ton, so I would have bought the PS4 version to play and likely been happy with it.

....


Then just refund the game on steam and get the PS4 version?

Judging by the steam user score on steam spy being in the low 40's, I'm sure you're not the only one. It's a feature that you can take advantage of, so do it.
 
Hmmm, as usual the steam reviews are mostly shit. I was looking for a good funny one but it's mostly either crash complaints or technical issues, which are all valid btw.

But this one in particular
" Their 18 quinquillion planets are just a bunch of re-color of the same assets, randomly generated with different combinations. Their representation of the universe is inaccurate, every single planet is inhabited with life and/or vegetation, there are no gas giants, no ring systems, no barren worlds, no actual moons, and no variation of star types. But i'm not here to talk about that stuff you can easily confirm by watching some gameplay. "

Just a small section. But he only had 3 hours played. And it's got 1600/2100~ people marking it as helpful. I just don't see how a review with that short engagement time is ever going to be helpful.

I guess some people make up their minds that quick though, and I won't say that is wrong.

As someone who's put in a lot of time into No Man's Sky for the past several days, he's right. There are no gas giants. Way too many planets have life and vegetation. There are very few dead planets (which if you think about it, is the norm when you consider the life / no life ratio). The ratio of living planets to dead planets in this game should be inversed. And there are no ringed-planets in the close to 20 hours I've already put in. Fuck man, no planet I've come across in the game so far looks as cool as Saturn, a fucking planet in or own goddamn solar system.

Also, all the buildings, shelters, and structures outside of the monoliths are the exact same fucking design, you'd think different aliens and cultures would design them differently.

You can argue that having that many dead planets would be boring - but I beg to differ. It would make the concept of exploration and specifically the joy of finding one with lush life and vegetation all the more rewarding and worthwhile. A 6 to 1 ratio of death to life would have been much better. And even that, technically isn't realistic.

There is no persistent progression on anything outside of the number of inventory slots you have. There is no mother base ship you can build, customize, enhance for example. You'd think that would be one of the first things they thought of.
 

shandy706

Member
Man, just imagine, all those people who have no idea what to do and can't see other people. They must be miserable!

It's actually kind of amazing to me how bad some people are at games.

My 4 year old daughter made it to world 8 in Mario 3D World on her own and I've seen streamers that struggle with simpler mechanics. Haha
 
Judging by the steam user score on steam spy being in the low 40's, I'm sure you're not the only one. It's a feature that you can take advantage of, so do it.

It's been going steadily up - at 53% right now. I remember it was in the 20s soon after launch. Given that most of the negative user reviews on Steam are "This game won't start on my computer," it only makes sense that the score would go up as bugs are fixed and advice offered.

And it looks like they're on top of the tech issues. Here's the official word:

Whilst many people are enjoying No Man's Sky, we are tracking several issues, and we’re working hard to resolve them as quickly as possible.

1. We have updated our support page with some common issues and workarounds http://www.no-mans-sky.com/2016/08/pc-support/
2. We have updated the auto response from support@hellogames.co.uk to help suggest common fixes, and help gather better info
3. We have filed tickets for everyone who has mailed support and are responding to them in turn.
4. We have gotten back to a lot of people already, who were trying to run the game significantly below min spec.
5. Additionally your bug reports have shown us a handful of key issues we are working to resolve

We’re pulling an all nighter to get through as many issues as soon as possible. Please try to be nice :)

We have been working to get back to people on our three most common crashes on start up:
• Running the game with an Intel card. This is not supported
• No Man's Sky is an OpenGL 4.5 game, and requires latest drivers on most cards, please update
• VC++ Redist 2010 was not included by default. We have updated in a patch, please restart

We are going to create an experimental branch with hot fixes for these most common known issues:
• Shader Cache issue – means that framerate is initially stuttering on some cards. Whilst it resolves itself over time (~1 hour of play), we will fix this issue in a patch.
• SSE 4 – for CPUs that do not support SSE 4, it is causing the game to crash on boot (some of these area technically below min spec, but we don’t want it to crash!)
• Mouse controls jitter on foot – this caused by a combination of certain resolution and GFX card. A fix is in progress.

Some players who have filed a support ticket will begin to be directed towards the experimental branch whilst we test solutions to these issues.

If your issues are not listed above please do mail support@hellogames.co.uk

Here are some things to be aware of:
We’ve brought a new QA team on board today (larger than the entire Hello Games team!). This will complement the existing Sony QA team.
We are working on fixes for the most critical issues, which will be in a patch in the near future.
We will be moving to a ticketed support system next week, and have hired someone to manage this starting Monday.
 

Sweep14

Member
Just messing around. I was anticipating this game so much, so to not be able to even play it ... sucks. If the PC version isnt up to scratch just delay it, I would have been fine buying the PS4 version if that was the only one available any time soon. Feels weird that this was one of my most anticipated games of the year and I cant even play it.

Nothings stops you from buying it on PS4 if you want to play it
 

Jimrpg

Member
There isnt enough space on the internet to explain whats wrong with me.

Game locks up my PC so...its the worst game I ever bought. Not sure what else to say.

Sean knew the game sucked on PC and released it anyway to make the $$$. Shame on him.

At 2 million copies which I think going by the amount of interest and early steam numbers show, Hello Games would be sitting on $100m. Thats some return for 15 guys.
 
I'm kind of surprised people think this kind of game would be refunded in the first place.

It's not like there isn't a vast history of PC gamers buying survival titles with mixed (or even actively bad) receptions by the millions.

DayZ: 3,439,433
Rust: 4,157,884
7 Days To Die: 1,541,487
Don't Starve Together: 4,637,945 (It has a better reception these days, but took off at launch when it received especially onerous reviews.)
ARK: Survival Evolved: 3,561,307
H1Z1: 2,472,741
The Forest: 2,169,353

This list certainly isn't exhaustive.
Wait 7 days to die actually worked for people?
 

dity

Member
Well, yeah. They've planned to add base building into the game in the near future. More other might also come later.

However, will that make NMS an early access game?
So they'll make settlements from Fallout 4?

And it looks like they're on top of the tech issues. Here's the official word:

The fact that the game just dies when you're below minimum spec is pretty dumb. I played through the game I just mentioned while below minimum spec on my old computer and it stayed solid for 90ish hours.
 

Ragnaroz

Member
I can't say anything about the game itself or the performance since I can't even start it because of the SSE4.1 bullshit.
 

barit

Member
Game is huge. Not only in scale and ambitions but even in sales figures!

lol congratz to HG. Best selling Indie game with a full price tag so far? For that money Sean can buy now two houses ;)
 
Amazon's hourly chart is really hourly or it can be for 1,2 days ago?
Because every time I open it, NMS has the #2 and #4 places (US) and #1 (UK), even after these reviews.
 
Top Bottom