The people here personally attacking those who still want to buy an occulus are the worst...im sorry, but its true.
Show me the receipts, you have 3 hours.
The people here personally attacking those who still want to buy an occulus are the worst...im sorry, but its true.
No, but it makes you harmfully ignorant at best. Supporting a racist man means you either are compliant with his views or don't give a shit, both equally bad, and before you retort saying "but what if you're not compliant with them" then why the fuck would you willingly support him?
Damn. Gotta love the mods here.Show me the receipts, you have 3 hours.
The people here personally attacking those who still want to buy an occulus are the worst...im sorry, but its true. You guys obviously spend your whole day yelling at peiple wherever you go right? The world is filled with people dont believe or do what you want. Have some modicum of empathy and respect for your fellow man.
Look sure it would be great if all companies executive leadership wasnt made up of shitbags but thats not the world we live in.
If you want to be a conscientious consumer go head...i think thats admirable, but at least dont attack people for not following your lead.
He's against legal immigration of brown peopleI assumed Trump's border/immigrant policies were extreme forms of wanting to control illegal immigration and it's potential damage it might cause.
I don't agree with it, but I never assumed/interpreted it was white supremecy disguised as policy.
Like I said, I haven't followed everything that comes out of the pig's mouth, but I haven't seen him being flagrantly racist, such as being against legal immigration.
edit:
Sorry for asking in this thread I guess. Just seemed like a convenient place to gauge what people are thinking. I'll do my research outside of this thread.
*rolls eyes*
I guess videogame hardware is more important to you than not supporting a racist idiot funding racism. *thumbs up* No one is attacking you, anyway. They're criticizing Palmer Luckey.
A truly inspirational man.
Because it's American politics. The other option is really really bad too! I personally support neither, but if gun held to my head and forced to choose, I'd probably choose Donald over Hillary. The harmfully ignorant shoe fits on both feet. It would appear her pile of dead bodies is much larger than Trumps. I'm more concerned with what a politician has done, over what they say, as history has shown they rarely make due with their campaign promises.
Plus, one actual positive for Trump is that both parties hate him. It indicates a shift from the status quo which is needed.
None of this is absolution for Palmer, there's no way to spin a high level employee being caught in this publicly. It's bad for the Oculus brand, I just hope it doesn't end up bad for VR if Oculus ends up being notably impacted.
Except himself.
Yeah, it's not Hans and Sven for sure.He's against legal immigration of brown people
Guess what...as a son of hispanic immigrants and a brotherof a gay man....i wont be buying an occulous...yep im making a concencious decision not to support their product because of what their executive does
The point of my post was about not attacking people who will still buy an occulous...i guess my point has been made
Since when is being genuinely hated by everyone a positive?Because it's American politics. The other option is really really bad too! I personally support neither, but if gun held to my head and forced to choose, I'd probably choose Donald over Hillary. The harmfully ignorant shoe fits on both feet. It would appear her pile of dead bodies is much larger than Trumps. I'm more concerned with what a politician has done, over what they say, as history has shown they rarely make due with their campaign promises.
Plus, one actual positive for Trump is that both parties hate him. It indicates a shift from the status quo which is needed.
None of this is absolution for Palmer, there's no way to spin a high level employee being caught in this publicly. It's bad for the Oculus brand, I just hope it doesn't end up bad for VR if Oculus ends up being notably impacted.
The point of my post was about not attacking people who will still buy an occulous...i guess my point has been made
I assumed Trump's border/immigrant policies were extreme forms of wanting to control illegal immigration and it's potential damage it might cause.
I don't agree with it, but I never assumed/interpreted it was white supremecy disguised as policy.
Like I said, I haven't followed everything that comes out of the pig's mouth, but I haven't seen him being flagrantly racist, such as being against legal immigration.
You don't shift the status quo by putting a circus clown in the white house.Because it's American politics. The other option is really really bad too! I personally support neither, but if gun held to my head and forced to choose, I'd probably choose Donald over Hillary. The harmfully ignorant shoe fits on both feet. It would appear her pile of dead bodies is much larger than Trumps. I'm more concerned with what a politician has done, over what they say, as history has shown they rarely make due with their campaign promises.
Plus, one actual positive for Trump is that both parties hate him. It indicates a shift from the status quo which is needed.
None of this is absolution for Palmer, there's no way to spin a high level employee being caught in this publicly. It's bad for the Oculus brand, I just hope it doesn't end up bad for VR if Oculus ends up being notably impacted.
People can still buy Oculus's all they want. What I do want, however, is for Facebook to fire Palmer.
When someone says most Mexicans are rapists and murderers and seeks to keep an entire group of people out of the country based on their religious beliefs, you can no longer argue that he isn't racist or prejudicial. He's xenophobic, nationalistic, and uses fear as a club to get people's attention.
Do some research.
okay, and what has hillary done? list everything, the good and the bad.
In what way?He funds the creation of dank memes. I don't see anything wrong with this. Also, supporting trump doesn't equal white supremacy.
People can still buy Oculus's all they want. What I do want, however, is for Facebook to fire Palmer.
Guess what...as a son of hispanic immigrants and a brotherof a gay man....i wont be buying an occulous...yep im making a concencious decision not to support their product because of what their executive does
The point of my post was about not attacking people who will still buy an occulous...i guess my point has been made
I assumed Trump's border/immigrant policies were extreme forms of wanting to control illegal immigration and it's potential damage it might cause.
I don't agree with it, but I never assumed/interpreted it was white supremecy disguised as policy.
Like I said, I haven't followed everything that comes out of the pig's mouth, but I haven't seen him being flagrantly racist, such as being against legal immigration.
edit:
Sorry for asking in this thread I guess. Just seemed like a convenient place to gauge what people are thinking. I'll do my research outside of this thread.
If you aren't killing or at least physically hurt non-white people, you cannot be called white supermacist I assume?can you guys interpret what your idea of white suptemecists are? I'm genuinely confused. I thought it was white people believing they are of the superior race and therefore should control society.
I assumed Trump's border/immigrant policies were extreme forms of wanting to control illegal immigration and it's potential damage it might cause.
I don't agree with it, but I never assumed/interpreted it was white supremecy disguised as policy.
Like I said, I haven't followed everything that comes out of the pig's mouth, but I haven't seen him being flagrantly racist, such as being against legal immigration.
edit:
Sorry for asking in this thread I guess. Just seemed like a convenient place to gauge what people are thinking. I'll do my research outside of this thread.
Just over the last few days :I assumed Trump's border/immigrant policies were extreme forms of wanting to control illegal immigration and it's potential damage it might cause.
I don't agree with it, but I never assumed/interpreted it was white supremecy disguised as policy.
Like I said, I haven't followed everything that comes out of the pig's mouth, but I haven't seen him being flagrantly racist, such as being against legal immigration.
edit:
Sorry for asking in this thread I guess. Just seemed like a convenient place to gauge what people are thinking. I'll do my research outside of this thread.
Technically it is a shift. Like putting a shit flinging ape in the White House would be one.You don't shift the status quo by putting a circus clown in the white house.
He funds the creation of dank memes. I don't see anything wrong with this. Also, supporting trump doesn't equal white supremacy.
Because it's American politics. The other option is really really bad too! I personally support neither, but if gun held to my head and forced to choose, I'd probably choose Donald over Hillary. The harmfully ignorant shoe fits on both feet. It would appear her pile of dead bodies is much larger than Trumps. I'm more concerned with what a politician has done, over what they say, as history has shown they rarely make due with their campaign promises.
Plus, one actual positive for Trump is that both parties hate him. It indicates a shift from the status quo which is needed.
None of this is absolution for Palmer, there's no way to spin a high level employee being caught in this publicly. It's bad for the Oculus brand, I just hope it doesn't end up bad for VR if Oculus ends up being notably impacted.
No? Again, no one has attacked anyone. You went through this same song and dance two years ago when you tried to pull a "YEAH BUT MEN FACE DISCRIMINATION TOO" in a thread about how women face it on a daily basis, making accusations of things said in the thread that turned out to not be true.
I assumed Trump's border/immigrant policies were extreme forms of wanting to control illegal immigration and it's potential damage it might cause.
I don't agree with it, but I never assumed/interpreted it was white supremecy disguised as policy.
Like I said, I haven't followed everything that comes out of the pig's mouth, but I haven't seen him being flagrantly racist, such as being against legal immigration.
edit:
Sorry for asking in this thread I guess. Just seemed like a convenient place to gauge what people are thinking. I'll do my research outside of this thread.
In an interview, Mr. Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel had “an absolute conflict” in presiding over the litigation given that he was “of Mexican heritage” and a member of a Latino lawyers’ association. Mr. Trump said the background of the judge, who was born in Indiana to Mexican immigrants, was relevant because of his campaign stance against illegal immigration and his pledge to seal the southern U.S. border. “I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of interest,” Mr. Trump said.
Because it's American politics. The other option is really really bad too! I personally support neither, but if gun held to my head and forced to choose, I'd probably choose Donald over Hillary. The harmfully ignorant shoe fits on both feet. It would appear her pile of dead bodies is much larger than Trumps. I'm more concerned with what a politician has done, over what they say, as history has shown they rarely make due with their campaign promises.
Plus, one actual positive for Trump is that both parties hate him. It indicates a shift from the status quo which is needed.
I own a Rift, never felt shamed in anyway by the posters in this thread. If I knew then what I know now, I wouldn't have bought it but I wouldn't hold it against anyone who did and I haven't seen anyone in this thread say anything different. The only thing I've seen people saying is they, themselves, would not support Oculus.
I own a Rift, never felt shamed in anyway by the posters in this thread. If I knew then what I know now, I wouldn't have bought it but I wouldn't hold it against anyone who did and I haven't seen anyone in this thread say anything different. The only thing I've seen people saying is they, themselves, would not support Oculus.
Since when is being genuinely hated by everyone a positive?
You gotta have to explain that one.
Because it's American politics. The other option is really really bad too! I personally support neither, but if gun held to my head and forced to choose, I'd probably choose Donald over Hillary. The harmfully ignorant shoe fits on both feet. It would appear her pile of dead bodies is much larger than Trumps. I'm more concerned with what a politician has done, over what they say, as history has shown they rarely make due with their campaign promises.
Plus, one actual positive for Trump is that both parties hate him. It indicates a shift from the status quo which is needed.
None of this is absolution for Palmer, there's no way to spin a high level employee being caught in this publicly. It's bad for the Oculus brand, I just hope it doesn't end up bad for VR if Oculus ends up being notably impacted.
He funds the creation of dank memes. I don't see anything wrong with this. Also, supporting trump doesn't equal white supremacy.
He funds the creation of dank memes. I don't see anything wrong with this. Also, supporting trump doesn't equal white supremacy.
People can still buy Oculus's all they want. What I do want, however, is for Facebook to fire Palmer.
It's no less abhorrent. And I'm sorry, ignorance isn't a good enough excuse.I agree. I can't overlook it either. My comment is just that there are people of all races that are overlooking it and this does not make the supporter racists.
He is the existing elite.When there is effectively only two meaningful parties in what is supposedly a open republic with democratically elected representatives, it's a good thing. Not saying Trump would actually end up good, but when both parties hate you then it is at least a sign that his interest isn't to continue to line the pockets of the existing elite.
He funds the creation of dank memes. I don't see anything wrong with this. Also, supporting trump doesn't equal white supremacy.
I agree with him. Less talking more action against racism.Just over the last few days :
- saying through Pence that people talk too much about racism in policing.
Lol this is too low key to get quoted but damn. I mean, Luckey does have some gnarly toenails from never wearing shoes..It's like him and Zuckerberg are both on a lifelong quest to become the next howard hughes and he got impatient.
Is Nimble America posting white racial crap or not?!?
From what I read, they are not and their goal is to shit post and make memes against Hillary.