perfectsil
Member
it's just the developer's choice and artistic direction
/s
/s
I doubt they are talking about the PS4 and PS3 versions having the same experience....I think you'll find the answer in your post. The push to get XB1 to run it at 1080p likely meant 30 fps (since very few XB1 games run at 1080/60), and they probably don't want the PS4 version to be blatantly superior.
OF COURSE THIS IS SPECULATION. But I believe this is absolutely a possibility.
No thanks. I don't think I can do the indie-only life, or Nintendo-only life where "next" gen and even current gen tech just doesn't exist. Boycott games that are scaled down? Sure.With this and the recent Watch_Dogs PC settings discovery... it's time to start boycotting some publishers/developers for this shit.
Uh, no. A higher framerate also makes every single frame look better. Come by my place and I can show you 30, 60, 120fps with both standard backlighting and strobing to show you what framerates do to modern displays. And then even aside from the hard benefits in the display itself, the increased motion data itself actually helps your eyes/brain track details better to soak in what is in each frame. Framerate has a huge impact on the visual appeal of a game.You do realize that higher frames per second do not make a game better visually right? It makes a game play and feel better, but for it to look "absolutely stunning" 60 FPS won't help that.
A game is not transmitted to your brain directly from the GPU.Because having higher frames per second does NOTHING to the visual quality of a game. You aren't getting higher resolution textures. You aren't getting a better lighting model. You aren't getting more advanced shaders. You aren't getting higher poly models. You aren't getting more Particles on screen. You don't get more enemies on screen. You aren't getting any more visual flare than with 30 FPS.
The only "visual" difference would be smoother animations, which I would hardly consider what makes a game look "absolutely stunning"
Wow, he actually said it.
So... Why go next gen at all?
It's not just the numbers, and with a Sega logo in your av you should know this full well since Dreamcast had so many awesome 60FPS games.
Nothing else needs to be said i guess.Were always balancing that out to make sure everyone gets the same experience,
So, cross-gen is the problem.
I don't understand how a game with a 10 year plan is focusing resources on 8 year old machines that have 2 years at best left.
They should've gone full force on the current-gen systems. AAA companies had very little foresight when it came to 360/PS3 sales since games like Watch_Dogs are showing that current-gen is where the bulk of sales are occurring.
Was that the objective of Rockstar and because they only reached 59FPS they decided to increase the active AI actors and tons of extra alpha blended textures and shit?Does it run at 60?
Ermm, nah yer alright. This is how things work I'm afraid. You make a high investment like this game, you need to ensure it's playable by a huge range of people as possible.
Get your panties in a bunch if you want mate, the rest of the world will enjoy the game.
I doubt they are talking about the PS4 and PS3 versions having the same experience....I think you'll find the answer in your post. The push to get XB1 to run it at 1080p likely meant 30 fps (since very few XB1 games run at 1080/60), and they probably don't want the PS4 version to be blatantly superior.
OF COURSE THIS IS SPECULATION. But I believe this is absolutely a possibility.
The game is awesome. The alpha looked great and ran smoothly.
bungie are never at the forefront of graphicsbengines, and this is cross platform too. wasn't unexpected.
Yeah, I have a hard time believing that too, especially with the lighting they showed off in the initial reveal. Am looking forward to seeing that in-game at some point.Oh man at people thinking if this wasn't cross-gen it would be 60fps.
maybe for you? I didnt have any issues. Nor anyone else i played with. And I even watched Twitch streams (lirik) were they werent even sure what the fps were, even after playign it for a god while.
Wouldnt latency have more to do with the network code, and i think the slugishness has more to do with the controls. I found them intially slugish, but upping my senstivity helped, and it felt at home after that. yes a higher fps would give the game better player feedback and let you respond to situations better, I would agree.
holy shit thats funny
funny thing is it is a bit true. The harder your GPU is pushed, the hotter it gets and the faster your fan needs to work.
I do that with my PC all the time. Crysis will work my GPU hard causing it to be around 64 degrees celcius. A game like Borderlands 2, not at all. I run that game at 48 celcius
...Were always balancing that out to make sure everyone gets the same experience,
Wth bungie. Ps4 version should be 24 Fps to deliver a more cinematic experience.
It's cool.
I get their reason, but damn the PS4 versions looks so damn good.
That's an opinion, far from a fact.
Ok, you tell me... since its clearly just MY opinion. What about 60 FPS would make a game look "absolutely stunning" in comparison to 30 FPS?
What aspect of the visuals are improved because of the frame rate that make it look "absolutely stunning" as what stated before?
Does Battlefield 3 not look "absolutely stunning" at 30 FPS when compared to BF4 at 60? What is so much better visually? Please tell me.
http://www.es.com/Products/60Frames.htmlHigher frame rates capture much more of the action every second, so there is much less opportunity for action to blur in any single frame. This produces much sharper images and creates the effect of higher perceived resolution on screen, both because of the blur reduction and the higher number of frames that present more information to our eyes. Perceptually, higher frame rates create the effect of higher resolution without increasing the number of pixels on screen.
Nobody can play with anybody.Can people play with each other irrespective of what platform they are on? I guess that kind of makes sense, then.
No thanks. I don't think I can do the indie-only life, or Nintendo-only life where "next" gen and even current gen tech just doesn't exist. Boycott games that are scaled down? Sure.
Is here anyone in this thread who will get Destiny on old gen?
Why is this bad? They sell one either way. XB1 player either buys it there, or decides to buy a PS4 and buys it there. Why not just make the best possible game on all systems? If there is crossplay, fine, but without crossplay I don't understand why they would pull their punches.
Yeah, I have a hard time believing that too, especially with the lighting they showed off in the initial reveal. Am looking forward to seeing that in-game at some point.
Was that the objective of Rockstar and because they only reached 59FPS they decided to increase the active AI actors and tons of extra alpha blended textures and shit?
In other news, Nintendo first-party Wii U games regularly hit 1080/60fps. Why? No compromises. That's just what you get with multiplatform games. Nature of the beast.
Destiny is not one game with 10 year plan. Bungie and Activision intends to make four Destiny games for 10 years.
In other news, Nintendo first-party games regularly hit 1080/60fps. Why? No compromises. That's just what you get with multiplatform games. Nature of the beast.
Because for some reason it's impossible to have online and offline co-op, it's always one or the other.Can they also explain why the game doesn't have local co-op or local competitive?
It seems like the game is much more co-op centric and social focused than the Halo series yet Bungie have abandoned couch multiplayer after more than a decade of supporting it in Halo.
Or they can't get the PS4 version at a locked 60 fps... Stop the conspiracy bullshit.
Ok, you tell me... since its clearly just MY opinion. What about 60 FPS would make a game look "absolutely stunning" in comparison to 30 FPS?
What aspect of the visuals are improved because of the frame rate that make it look "absolutely stunning" as was stated before?
Does Battlefield 3 not look "absolutely stunning" at 30 FPS when compared to BF4 at 60? What is so much better visually? Please tell me.
In other news, Nintendo first-party Wii U games regularly hit 1080/60fps. Why? No compromises. That's just what you get with multiplatform games. Nature of the beast.
The full screen image really made me feel less immersed.