CouchMaster
Member
It's smooth as long as you don't do constant 180s
It's smooth as long as you don't do constant 180s
This doesn't make sense to me. The encode is forcing dropped frames under the exact same situations multiple times? I could believe a stutter here and there but this is replicable.
Lol. Smooth frame rate is more important then higher resolution. Glad I am getting this on XB1.
Gifs usually have reduced frames or else the file size explodes. And even when none were removed there's no telling if it's slightly sped up or slowed downThe gifs came from a video.
Just hoping that we stay with the actual videos when it's about fps and not start throwing gifs aroundIt's not like the video the GIF was taken from is any different, so yeah, sure, why not?
The framerate sucks, no need for denial.
Lol.Lol. Smooth frame rate is more important then higher resolution. Glad I am getting this on XB1.
1)
3) Anyone who says "solid 60 fps" and Call of Duty is, usually, a momo.
The digital foundry for this game is going to be hilarious. I expect a rage filled thread and disappointment on every version.
So ignore the video of the Xbox One version running, ignore the videos of the game stuttering even on SLI'd Titans, ignore the tweet from the journo saying the Xbox One version runs worse than the PS4 version,instead ignoring what your eyes see and listening to the vague opinion of some random journo who only played this version briefly?
I seriously can't think of any other FPS on consoles with a better frame rate than COD.
To me, this is the definition of "solid 60 fps"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIY7zCssueY
I haven't played it yet, but based on most reviews, Ghosts also runs a solid 60 fps on 360.
LIES
Uhhhh, the only version that didn't launch at the same time as the others is the Xbox One version. Plenty of people have the PS4 version already (including me).
I can't believe you confessed to buying this garbage just for the purpose of nitpicking my post.
Okay, you got me.
IW hasn't patched in Nvidia's fur Physx or Tubulence features yet. Imagine how it'll run then
It's going to be non stop Infinity Ward bashing. And I kind of feel sorry for them. Activision probably treated them like shit and forced them to spread their resources too thin.The digital foundry for this game is going to be hilarious. I expect a rage filled thread and disappointment on every version.
I seriously can't think of any other FPS on consoles with a better frame rate than COD.
To me, this is the definition of "solid 60 fps"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIY7zCssueY
I haven't played it yet, but based on most reviews, Ghosts also runs a solid 60 fps on 360.
Why are you doing this?me too
Because it looks leagues better than every other next-gen launch title? Although Killzone is also incredibly impressive and has the 60 FPS advantage.
I understand, alright? I was more invested in the unwarranted trolling of the OP than I am in this game. Honestly, I only had a vague idea the PS3/360/Wii U versions were out.
If they have to drop the resolution and framerate for it to look good, then that's a problem.
Also, I suggest you download the recent Killzone Shadow Fall footage and watch it.
Let's not create excuses for IW and watching those videos I doubt it's too much to render.
Then why is it 900p/30fps?
You should check out the newest RYSE footage too.
RAGE destroys COD on that aspect. The game is locked at 60 fps during the shooter parts. It never goes below.
1) The premise of the article is weak. He played one multiplayer match.
2) I do not take technical advice from people who can't tell the difference between 720p and 1080p.
3) Anyone who says "solid 60 fps" and Call of Duty is, usually, a momo.
4) I FUCKIN' LOVE PUGS
That, thread derailers, is how you trash a crap article.
Next person to troll the OP with garbage will be banned until Xbox Two comes out.
I'm not creating an excuse for IW at all. I'm responding to your claim that the video is not a reliable judge of frame rate because it's on Youtube.
Youtube can introduce a stutter into uploads, but I highly doubt that stutter would coincidentally line up in a consistent spot like it does in that video. It's when he stands on top of that truck and pans over the entire map.
Also, the entirety of CoD Ghosts doesn't look like it should be hard to render, but the performance issues on PC clearly demonstrate IW did not optimize the game at all.
Plenty of evidence right in front of you but you are ignoring it.
This game seems to run like shit regardless of platform.
Can't wait for the side-by-side video comparisons.
It's funny to me that people are nitpicking over resolution and framerate for a game that has done absolutely fuck all to truly call itself "next-gen" and has instead remained in the same old worn-out trappings of last-gen gaming. Lackluster presentation of an unambitious game...which sadly people will still buy of course. :-\
Dynamic Framerate.
How can someone say the frame rate is smooth when it looks like this?
If they have to drop the resolution and framerate for it to look good, then that's a problem.
Also, I suggest you download the recent Killzone Shadow Fall footage and watch it.
What makes you say that? I played 2 hours of mp last night and it was fun.It's funny to see people still choosing a platform for a game that should be off EVERYONE's radar.
Game is garbage and is a step down in every way from the previous entries.
Well there's also the option that the game actually didn't have framedrops during the one match he played.
It's funny to see people still choosing a platform for a game that should be off EVERYONE's radar.
Game is garbage and is a step down in every way from the previous entries.
How can someone say the frame rate is smooth when it looks like this?
Awww i thought u were one of the fun mods
Uh I'm not ignoring it and that evidence proves nothing as it can't prove the Destructoid writer wrong, the only thing that would is actual footage of what he played.
The Youtube footage could easily be a old build, different gamemode or a different map and all three could make a huge difference.
Why do people keep saying this? It apparently runs great on X360 but that's about it.
It looks pretty awful on a PC with all the settings turned up, too.Damn, I know the video's compressed to hell and on YT, but that game just looks awful.
So we have Manabyte tweeting that it runs worse on Xbox One, people clossed over it, this person writes after playing one match that it was flawless and everyone takes it as scripture...
I am subscribing just to see what comes next.
That seems like a bit much, doesn't really compare to BF4 but it looks quite nice and has some great textures. Certainly a step up from other CoD games.It looks pretty awful on a PC with all the settings turned up, too.
Most console games are 30 FPS so I don't know if it really counts as dropping the framerate when it's the standard. Certainly a shame it's not 60 but as long as It's a consistent 30 FPS I don't really think it's an issue.
And I have and it's looks very impressive, especially for multiplayer! Still think Ryse seems to be doing a lot more and is really on another level. Of course as we've mentioned the framerate is only 30 which should be taken into account.
50 Mbps direct download footage of Ryse if we're going to start throwing links around.
Here