Lol come on now.Racial was added by CNN...
What would you like to call blocking and deporting Muslims from living in the country? People Profiling? Does that make you feel better?
Lol come on now.Racial was added by CNN...
Is this the part where we recognize that he's not as rich as he says he is? Or are we still pretending that's not true?
In what world is Trump excluded from this group when he says the problem is that we're not being harsh enough?emphasis mine.
it happens. Collateral damage is a given when you are dropping bombs. You accept collateral damage when you push the big red button. The existing ruling class (of which Hillary is a member) has decided that our interference into that region, a costly ineffective affair, is worth extreme collateral damage. This is not really debatable.
Wait...what?!? The US is NOT intentionally bombing hospitals. You must be thinking of the Syrians or Russians who Trump idolizes.
What has Hillary said on the matter, according to you?
Here is something for you to read, by the way.
I admit that I don't watch the repetitive news cycles on the candidates, but by all accounts he appears to be critical of the continued wars in the middle east and believes that our meddling in elections and or installing leaders in these regions to be risky.
Do I know he won't continue them, no, but of the two candidates he appears to be more likely to stop using the drones.
I admit that I don't watch the repetitive news cycles on the candidates, but by all accounts he appears to be critical of the continued wars in the middle east and believes that our meddling in elections and or installing leaders in these regions to be risky.
Do I know he won't continue them, no, but of the two candidates he appears to be more likely to stop using the drones.
It's not what she's said, it's what she's done, least you forget she actually holds a high level governmental position.
It's not what she's said, it's what she's done, least you forget she actually holds a high level governmental position.
Versus continuing to bomb hospitals in the middle east with drones? The things you listed are important things, they are. I'm in an inter-racial marriage myself. I get that. I just think the endless murder (of brown people from a far far away land) is a more important issue than social rights of those that get to continue breathing.
Again, all else, both are horrible choices for POTUS, but it's not a simple good versus evil dichotomy that many are making it out to be. Hillary is a monster, she just doesn't show it in front of a microphone and television camera. Donald doesn't try to hide it the fact that he is a monster.
emphasis mine.
it happens. Collateral damage is a given when you are dropping bombs. You accept collateral damage when you push the big red button. The existing ruling class (of which Hillary is a member) has decided that our interference into that region, a costly ineffective affair, is worth extreme collateral damage. This is not really debatable.
It's like taking a shit on the floor and announcing that you will not be cleaning it up.You don't get to pull "This is not really debatable" on anything one post after confessing ignorance.
You don't get to pull "This is not really debatable" on anything one post after confessing ignorance.
I did not confess ignorance, I confessed to not watching repetitive news cycles.
I did not confess ignorance, I confessed to not watching repetitive news cycles.
Versus continuing to bomb hospitals in the middle east with drones? The things you listed are important things, they are. I'm in an inter-racial marriage myself. I get that. I just think the endless murder (of brown people from a far far away land) is a more important issue than social rights of those that get to continue breathing.
Again, all else, both are horrible choices for POTUS, but it's not a simple good versus evil dichotomy that many are making it out to be. Hillary is a monster, she just doesn't show it in front of a microphone and television camera. Donald doesn't try to hide it the fact that he is a monster.
A repetitive news cycle that doesn't agree with your imaginationI did not confess ignorance, I confessed to not watching repetitive news cycles.
I did not confess ignorance, I confessed to not watching repetitive news cycles.
You don't get to pull "This is not really debatable" on anything one post after confessing ignorance.
Donald Trump has a long history of stepping over little people in the ruthless pursuit of his real estate empire. If you're going to judge Hillary Clinton because she's been a politician, how can you possibly not judge Donald Trump for his business career?
emphasis mine.
it happens. Collateral damage is a given when you are dropping bombs. You accept collateral damage when you push the big red button. The existing ruling class (of which Hillary is a member) has decided that our interference into that region, a costly ineffective affair, is worth extreme collateral damage. This is not really debatable.
So it's easy to make the logical leap that they are at least supporting white supremacy, if not spreading it directly.
Well it does. A spade is being called a spade.
It's weird how some of you get so much more offended at him being called a racist than being offended by him doing shit that propogates racism
“They won’t refuse. They’re not going to refuse me,” he said. “If I say do it, they’re going to do it.”
Does Hillary condone torture and think it's "fun"?I can and do judge Trump, I judge both. From what I see they are both shitty horrible people, I just think that Trump will end up with less bloody hands.
Claiming he will "bomb the shit out of" countries, would consider using nuclear weapons, and is pro-torture sounds like a peaceful candidate to you? Uh, what?I can and do judge Trump, I judge both. From what I see they are both shitty horrible people, I just think that Trump will end up with less bloody hands.
Again, I'm not voting for him, I just get sucked into debate when it people make it sound like this election cycle only has one monster.
"Both are bad choices" is shit level thinking, and honestly flat out wrong. You're just flat out wrong.
One is very clearly a monster based on the things he says and does, and the other has been the target of nonstop berating from conservative media for 20+ years in attempt to make the American people see her as a monster by default.
One is very clearly an absolutely terrible choice for POTUS, and one is clearly absolutely a better alternative by millions of light years.
emphasis mine.
it happens. Collateral damage is a given when you are dropping bombs. You accept collateral damage when you push the big red button. The existing ruling class (of which Hillary is a member) has decided that our interference into that region, a costly ineffective affair, is worth extreme collateral damage. This is not really debatable.
I just think that Trump will end up with less bloody hands.
Hopefully it also showed that saying both sides are equally horrible betrays that lack of knowledge 😁
Sorry, was replying to Scubasteve but accidentally quoted you--now fixed.There is a HUGE difference between accidentally killing civilians when targeting terrorist leaders, and directly targeting hospitals. It is not even close.
Besides, what would you prefer our response to be?
The fact is that drone strikes are the best of all bad options. Unless you can think of a way to fight a war with no collateral damage, then you just have to accept that fact.
- A) Do nothing to respond to terrorist attacks on the US and our allies or ISIS gains territory
- B) Send in ground troops who would cause even more civilian casualties
I can and do judge Trump, I judge both. From what I see they are both shitty horrible people, I just think that Trump will end up with less bloody hands.
Again, I'm not voting for him, I just get sucked into debate when it people make it sound like this election cycle only has one monster.
Gotta make yourself feel better about your closet racism and xenophobia somehow.It's quite funny seeing people try to do their Both Sides song and dance this election of all elections. The mental gymnastics must be exhausting this time around.
But Trump agreed that racial profiling was a good thing in O'Reilly the day before CNN.Racial was added by CNN...
That's your opinion, and if you reject all of the evidence that disqualifies Hillary as a good person or a suitable for the position of POTUS, then you're no better than the conservative media.
The fact that you (seemingly) are going to willfully vote (i'm not voting for trump btw) for Hillary speaks volumes
Ah right, his plan to profile muslim immigrants wasn't racial in nature. Got it.
the other has been the target of nonstop berating from conservative media for 20+ years in attempt to make the American people see her as a monster by default.
I admit that I don't watch the repetitive news cycles on the candidates, but by all accounts he appears to be critical of the continued wars in the middle east and believes that our meddling in elections and or installing leaders in these regions to be risky.
Do I know he won't continue them, no, but of the two candidates he appears to be more likely to stop using the drones.
I'm sure there are people over there having long meetings about this today. We'll see what the outcome of this is soon enough.How does he still have a job at facebook? He should be fired immediately.