Man, I want the single player campaign on PC as well. :/
The thirst is real lmao. This stuff leading up to release is going to be more entertaining then the game itself.
Man, I want the single player campaign on PC as well. :/
Eventually free-to-play on Wii U too? The press release uses the Nintendo term free-to-start for the PC version.
I've been saying for a while that DDevil's Third looks very easy to monetize as a free-to-play title.
I wonder with the free-to-play game Project Treasure (which has some striking similarities with its Japanese hack and slash combat along with first-person shooting) if Nintendo plans to eventually release a free-to-play version on Wii U as well. Otherwise why publish a game whose unique selling point on the platform is a single-player mode that reviewers have already said is dreadful.
Well if the whole thing was designed with PC F2P version in mind then that kinda explains why game has performance issues (as reviewers say).
PC version is F2P multiplayer only.
Somewhere, Unseen64 guy is crying in a corner staring at a picture of his source just wanting to kill him.
I'll jump of a bridge mentally if this sells more than The Wonderful 101.The thirst is real lmao. This stuff leading up to release is going to be more entertaining then the game itself.
This. That Project HAMMER story was probably at least half made up.
Well if the whole thing was designed with PC F2P version in mind then that kinda explains why game has performance issues (as reviewers say).
You're speculating on speculation.
Probably moreso of frauds and I wouldn't say "salty" but that might be because I loathe overused "words".
Why would he be crying? Most stuff resulted be true.
Well if the whole thing was designed with PC F2P version in mind then that kinda explains why game has performance issues (as reviewers say).
Same difference, that's what you get for believing sources.I'm relaying other's speculation. Do you not understand the difference?
Like what exactly?
Yeah, at this point, I would be surprised if Fatal Frame was actually digital-only. I think people just jumped the gun on that assumption.
The game is shitty and most Reviewers trashed it but could not say because embargo.
Wow - PC is getting a version? LOL
Did not see that coming if true.
bingo!
they took nintendo's money and spent it all on the f2p multiplayer, going by all the footage we've seen the multiplayer clearly looks like the only redeeming feature.
At least the wii u version includes multiplayer but it's starting to make sense why NOA were pissed, they must have known about the f2p pc multiplayer and realised all their money went on that and none on the single player.
Nintendo really got screwed i think.
Wait PC? Were there any hints of that before or is this out of nowhere?
It's Devil's Third and nobody sources to me, come on. I gave the same shit to Peer Schneider for being wrong. "Sources" will always amuse me, especially when people buy them.You sure seems to take this to heart.
lol, but seriously this is a smart way to recoup some costs, maybe even a pity token by Nintendo to Vakhalla.
I just fear for Fatal Frame, Xenoblade and SMT x FE, which of these is going to be eshop only? not released on NA? moved?
lol, but seriously this is a smart way to recoup some costs, maybe even a pity token by Nintendo to Vakhalla.
I just fear for Fatal Frame, Xenoblade and SMT x FE, which of these is going to be eshop only? not released on NA? moved?
Oh, I know. Which is why Valhalla can publish it on PC.
Still, it's pretty crazy, since they funded the remainder of the project and are publishing it themselves on Wii U. For all intents and purposes, it's a first party Nintendo game and this type of agreement isn't something we've seen from Nintendo in the past. At least, not that I can think of.
This. That Project HAMMER story was probably at least half made up.
Valhalla's press release : http://www.valhallagamestudios.com/en/company/release/20150721.pdf
Devil's Third Online is planned for september on PC. The Devil's Third IP remains to Valhalla, even if the Story mode will only be on Wii U.
The game is shitty and most Reviewers trashed it but could not say because embargo.
Q4...Man is there enough polish for this to be better than previews?
What a scoop! /s
So yeah, basically what everyone is saying for a year now. We should all become "trusted sources". Fact is there was nothing but clickbait rumors. Then there were rumor denying rumors. Then we had people believe the status quo was only unchangend because rumors of rumors of rumors. So in the end.. nothing changed. Game is still shitty but we somehow had 2 weeks of news over.. nothing. Just some people in need for clicks. And the usual suspects making a noise to be "lol nintendo" for another 5 minutes on the internet,
Unseen64, Siliconera and Emily Rogers.
For a year... Yet people still went in denial or calling names just for about this being called a bad game.
Lets not pretend there were no people defending this game.
None of those are credible.
Gamers need to stop legitimizing these rando blogs and twitter accounts that make crap up/speculate.
So Japan and Europe gets the game in Aug
PC gets the game in Sept
And NA gets the game sometime from Oct to Dec
smh NOA strikes again with their BS
So Japan and Europe gets the game in Aug
PC gets the game in Sept
And NA gets the game sometime from Oct to Dec
smh NOA strikes again with their BS
None of those are credible.
Gamers need to stop legitimizing these rando blogs and twitter accounts that make crap up/speculate.
What a scoop! /s
So yeah, basically what everyone is saying for a year now. We should all become "trusted sources". Fact is there was nothing but clickbait rumors. Then there were rumor denying rumors. Then we had people believe the status quo was only unchangend because rumors of rumors of rumors. So in the end.. nothing changed. Game is still shitty but we somehow had 2 weeks of news over.. nothing. Just some people in need for clicks. And the usual suspects making a noise to be "lol nintendo" for another 5 minutes on the internet,
Have we reached a point where statements directly from creators still fall under the label of rumor? I wonder what course of action Itagaki would actually have to take to warrant the legitimacy of something he says regarding his game.
Do not believe his lies
Well...