not on a console, on a dev-kitLED display on the console?
LED display on the console?
Hmm, hey, here's an early PlayStation 2 concept, probably not an official one.
*Ahem*... Anyway.
I really hope Microsoft chose to use some form of Zen for the CPU in the Scorpio because I really don't want another gen of sub 30fps and bad frame pacing again, Come on Microsoft!
Thursday can't come soon enough!
It's the same gen.
You can carry on the rest of the gen with sub 30fps and poor frame pacing then if the arbitrary human division of what is a generation of electronic hardware bothers you so much.
I mean, it's using next generation production techniques and an entirely different architecture. It's using the next generation of GPU and CPU from he model before...
Unless you define a "gen" to have some other arbitrary change, such as a new controller or games that don't work on the machines you owned before .
I sure wish I had a 4K tv
And yet all the games this "new gen" hardware will get will have to be based on the "old gen" hardware.
And yet all the games this "new gen" hardware will get will have to be based on the "old gen" hardware.
It's the same gen. Look at the PS4 Pro. It's better than the PS4 and yet it's not the focus. It's nice to have for people who care.
So there are no possible visual or performance improvements that can be made for games that are currently out on current gen machines?
It's a stupid argument.
I think the arguement is that having to build games to be scalable to mid or low-end hardware (like xbone) will result in games that don't look at good as they can on high end hardware.Why leave it behind? All PC games are playable on almost all PCs. You just lower the graphics to your machine and boom shit works.
Hey you want it looking better? Buy our new console.
Thats just a policy which can be changed at a moments notice. It would surprise me if Scorpio doesnt have exclusive (or cross gen with the next Xbox) games 5 years from now.
Both games could get ported to PC and look better than they do on the PS4s. They'd also run on lower hardware than a base PS4.I think the arguement is that having to build games to be scalable to mid or low-end hardware (like xbone) will result in games that don't look at good as they can on high end hardware.
It's why Uncharted 4 or Horizon look better than the Witcher 3 on PC
is it really always jaguar holding back 60?
I dont think a better cpu is always going to bring about 60 fps, maybe an optional 60fps mode but if games are ultra setting and 4k native then I wouldn't imagine 60 is coming too often.
Extreme confidence in your specs isn't arrogant or overconfident if they deliver. We don't know if they will deliver yet but going to DF with it makes the leakers saying it's better than expected more credible. DF is not going to pull punches for MS is the point being made. It would then follow that MS is confident in the tech specs.
MS gave DF exclusive interviews and 'deep dives' for xbox1, giving Penello more coverage for his bullshit train- and we all know how that went.
Many games in pro boost mode is running proportionally better with the higher clocked cpu, suggesting framerate is cpu limited.
Given that we've seen AMD hardware in the last xbox one, ps4 and pro we can pretty much scale expectations based on what the raw numbers say.
If Crazy Buttocks on a Train doesn't confirm it, it's not real. Hah.
Kidding aside, looking forward to this.
Don't get me wrong about CBOAT but the last we heard from them was late 2015 right? Does anyone think CBOAT would have anything and if so, usually would have posted by now based on the current leaks. Maybe they have moved on to other lands?
Being honest though, i don't mind waiting this week to see if things pan out for a DF deep dive.
5 years is a long time. Who knows what will happen until then.
I just find it confusing how people go against the official wording time and time again. Spencer even said there was no reason to buy a Scorpio if one doesn't own a 4K TV. How can someone then go and say it's the next gen? Doesn't make much sense.
But we all have to re-establish what those terms even mean thanks to the new console structures. To me a gen is a platform that plays games not available on older platforms. And that's not at all what Scorpio seems to be.
I hope so too. A countdown post from Larry Hryb would be nice.Hopefully something from MS today.
I'm pretty sure Phil had them beaten with bats and buried in a corn field.
Rösti;233266040 said:I hope so too. A countdown post from Larry Hryb would be nice.
Say goodbye to your "gens" then as you probably will not see those type of switches anymore at least with Microsoft. Thats what all this Backward Compatibility , Forward Compatibility, Xbox Play Anywhere, Game Pass and Universal Windows Platform is about: That you can take your game catalog/backlog over to the successor of a console and still able to play it.
Both games could get ported to PC and look better than they do on the PS4s. They'd also run on lower hardware than a base PS4.
That statement is pretty silly. Software is at its most powerful. We're at a point in time where it's at its easiest to make games scalable.
Those titles were built upon completely different architectures. We're not in that situation now.the problem being that those scalable titles will never meet the expectations associated with the specs of the new system itself. people will expect a generational gap level of visual difference between the xbone and the scorpio, but all they might end up getting is native 4k and slightly better texture filtering thats not only a poor use of power, but not a very discernible one compared to the competition. and it will always be held back by the lower end of the spectrum.
it's why black flag didn't look like a "next gen" title at the PS4's launch. it was held back by ultimately being a last gen title too. only now we've moved into a situation were that doesn't just happen for the first year or so of a consoles lifespan, but spans the entire thing. i'm not sure i see the benefits tbh. same is true for the pro.
Right, Project Helix. Some good changes are coming.If anything traditional console generations are doing more harm than good if we are talking about graphics and such. Consoles hold the industry back in terms of multiplatform games at the planning stages having to think about the lowest denominator. Heck, I'd say it even effects first party games not being able to make huge distinctive leaps with their sequels over the span of the gen. Not to mention all the time and effort and money spent trying to eek out as much of the power of the consoles as they can over the long gens.
PC if I am not mistaken doesn't have this problem and has always been the definitive place to play games and that is more like an iterative space than traditional console gens. This has remained true no matter the generation consoles where on. This has a lot to do with the way games on PC scale to various types of hardware which MS at least has specifically mentioned they are utilizing for Scorpio from here on out for launching all games on Xbox One as well. I see no reason that with the iterative console approach (if it is indeed where we are headed) that we shouldn't be looking at it more (not exactly) like GPU's releasing for PC and being able to reach further fidelity in games with each one sooner/faster than we could before with traditional gens.
So, as a PC only gamer, I very much welcome these new iterative consoles because they will be raising the bar graphics wise for me as well much sooner than normal.
NOTE: This is more for those who understand the impact that RAM and such have on games and what avenues having more opens up for development possibilities during the planning stages.
Those titles were built upon completely different architectures. We're not in that situation now.
To think the pro is not being fully utilised is also silly.
a game made exclusively for the pro would look better than a game that is on both, i stand by that. scorpio is the same. and if both continue to waste resources on 4k, then that too is only making matters worse. we have games on pro that look largely the same running at higher res, it's like...big whoop. i'd rather see the power utilised in a way that makes the games actually look better in regards to assets and effects. instead we're getting force fed 4k despite majority of gamers not having the means to even take advantage of it. i've never seen a gen of consoles where power was exponentially higher and yet the results barely changed, and yet here we are. it's backwards imo.
I thought Phil was ntkrnlI always thought Phil Spencer was Cboat. Xbox One needed that leaked hype more than ever back then.
Agreed. It's getting increasingly clear that Sony can't do this efficiently, coding their games to the metal is what they did and the result would be that BC will be broken when they move to Ryzen
I agree that the 4K focus is silly. But how are you going to push higher fifelity and better image quality to the average consumer?
It's the same gen.
a game made exclusively for the pro would look better than a game that is on both, i stand by that. scorpio is the same. and if both continue to waste resources on 4k, then that too is only making matters worse. we have games on pro that look largely the same running at higher res, it's like...big whoop. i'd rather see the power utilised in a way that makes the games actually look better in regards to assets and effects. instead we're getting force fed 4k despite majority of gamers not having the means to even take advantage of it. i've never seen a gen of consoles where power was exponentially higher and yet the results barely changed, and yet here we are. it's backwards imo.
I wonder how it will look...
I'd like a gunmetal console at launch pls