• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Giant Bomb: PS4.5 / PS4K is codenamed NEO, more info

RedRum

Banned
Interesting. The one thing I'm thankful for is that there will not only be no NEO-exclusive games but not even NEO-exclusive gameplay features - if this turns out to be true. That would fully alleviate the initial worries I had about this whole concept.

For $500 dollars I almost want to see them have exclusives and see how far they could push it.
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
Yeah I'm intrigued by how Sony will go about marketing this.

The games will look sharper. Better effects. Probably nearly universal better fps in vr games. This is definitely enough to market a premium model. Remember: even 'just' a larger hard drive has been enough to market $100 premiums in the past!
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
Base + neo mode is sensible and I think what a lot of people were suggesting before. The more recent rumours of the ps4 version being 'significantly downgraded' never sounded right to me.

Double the CUs at a higher clock, plus decent CPU bump sounds pretty nice. Will probably grab one if they're the same price

I wonder if they'll redo the base PS4 with a shrink APU to bring costs down?
 
I'll be curious to see which versions of upcoming games Sony uses to market them. Will we see Horizon and The Last Guardian running on OG PS4 at events with lower frame rate and visuals, or will we see the NEO versions and the game running at optimum performance? People bitch when a game is running on PC and gets downgraded at release, so will we see similar outrage when God of War 4 is demonstrated on PS4k and then we get our first-look at GoW PS4 and it is downgraded by comparison.

Why would Sony ever show their 1st party IP on the old PS4?
You're right that they damn will release footage/demo everything on PS4 Neo and I wouldn't blame them for doing so, it's simple marketing really.

As for people getting angry at potentially poor running PS4 games that's inevitable.

Question is whether these future games were always going to run like shit in the future? But I'd like to believe devs will be doing their best to optimise to their largest pool of customers..who knows with that one..
 

AmyS

Member
7970 to the PS4s 7850. Though 7970 only has 32CUs so its slightly faster.


vc9xe9X.jpg


So would that mean the new PS4 would be getting equivalent of a full Tahiti GPU, without any CUs disabled ?

I guess it would, given just 3.5 Teraflops for Tahiti.

Then the specific clockspeed of the new PS4 GPU (911 MHz) brings it to about 4.1 Teraflops.

Edit: I didn't see this:

PS4's GPU is a Pitcairn

So, looks like NEO is a Tahiti Pro GPU?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_HD_7000_Series

Somewhere around a Radeon HD 7950 and a Radeon 7970, mixing and matching different clocks and memory bandwidth.
 

Reallink

Member
I just don't buy the "this won't be a main focus for Sony" thing. They're not releasing a $400 box as some kind of side project. This will be pushed hard.

Not just pushed hard, it'll quickly become the defacto standard. Maybe not over night, but gradually over a year or two. Like the 360 Core ("'tard pack"), or 20GB PS3, PS4 base will be a SKU no one wants and retailers don't want to stock.
 

The God

Member
Who is to say they won't push the cheaper PS4 harder .
Since more people buying the system means more software and PS+ sales.
For eg come black friday i expect them to push the cheaper system and not the more expensive one .
PS4k will get push as a hardcore product like PSVR .

If the GameStop rumor is true then Sony is already building games to directly show off the PS4K. If you think they're not going to push this new console, I don't know what to tell you.
 

Eolz

Member
If those are the specs, they're underwhelming to say the least.
But yeah, now it's really just a console upgrade and nothing else.
 

Greddleok

Member
This makes me so sad. Now I 100% regret buying a PS4 instead of a PC. The whole point is you don't have to upgrade, it's just there. If this is how consoles are going to be from now on, only Nintendo will get my money.
 

The God

Member
Not just pushed hard, it'll quickly become the defacto standard. Maybe not over night, but gradually over a year or two. Like the 360 Core ("'tard pack"), or 20GB PS3, PS4 base will be a SKU no one wants and retailers don't want to stock.
and OG owners get fucked (eventually).
 

Daffy Duck

Member
The games will look sharper. Better effects. Probably nearly universal better fps in vr games. This is definitely enough to market a premium model. Remember: even 'just' a larger hard drive has been enough to market $100 premiums in the past!

But how do you get that message across to consumers in a coherent way to those who aren't the die hard performance chasing crowd?

I know they aren't the target audience but they'll be confused by all this.
 
People are acting like Sony is gonna kick in their door and replace their current PS4 with a pile of shit or something.

The box in your house is the exact same as it was when you bought it. Why assume that every new game coming out will run like shit on the standard PS4? The 30-something million unit install base should be incentive for publishers and devs to make sure new games are running at least decently on the standard unit, no?

That's where the majority of people will be playing their games, why wouldn't devs ensure that they're getting a good experience?

Maybe I'm just being overly optimistic but I just don't see games limping along on the standard PS4 being the norm seeing as how they will still be the biggest console user base.
 
If the GameStop rumor is true then Sony is already building games to directly show off the PS4K. If you think they're not going to push this new console, I don't know what to tell you.

Every game will be better on PS4K so i expect they going to show that version .
Still to push something that would depend on marketing .
Which why i say it depends on which one they pushing harder and at what time.
 
Oh, look, it's a completely conservative upgrade that's nowhere near as extreme as people feared.

Oh, look, a parade of people who can't accept that their PS4 isn't 'the best' anymore. PS4K threads are going to get boring really fast.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
It may be old news in terms of tech-time but I legitimately bought a PS4 in 2013 as my investment for the next 3-6 years.

I feel like I haven't even gotten my return on that investment yet. I certainly didn't spend the money just for early gen 2013-2015 gaming.

I think this legitimately sucks the momentum out of the golden era that was early PS4 and the new post-humbling Sony. A slide back into hubris... It happens to them all.

So continue to enjoy your PS4 for a few more years. I don't think you're going to get some dramatic 'fall off cliff' performance drop that people like to hyperbolise about. But you'll have to get over the idea that someone might play games hat look a bit better than yours.

As for PSVR - hopefully this will allow games to look a bit nicer, or perhaps some devs will use the power to go native 90 instead of 60. But again, base PS4 users shouldn't worry - Sony are likely to be very strict about PSVR frame rates being solid on both versions.
 

Yoshi

Headmaster of Console Warrior Jugendstrafanstalt
Taking FF15 as an example, Square Enix is already spending a ton of time and effort trying to get their engine to run decently on current-gen hardware. They're gonna keep optimizing up until the very end, and even still I don't foresee a rock solid 30 FPS out of the game. To add a Neo performance profile on TOP of everything that they're doing? I'm willing to be a lot of devs will not focus on it at all, since they're required to ship on regular PS4 as well. Post-launch performance patches I can see being a thing for devs under a time crunch (aka most of them), but still, do people really want to buy another console to wait longer post-launch to get a customized performance profile for marginally better performance? I guess if people have money to burn or they're completely new PS4 adopters in which case the profile will be just gravy, but otherwise I don't think it'll be worth it at the end of the day.

You know, it can, and I would guess will most likely be the other way around: Later games are optimised for PS4k and the PS4 profile is just a second note, maybe being patched up later on.
 

robo

Member
We're does this leave Microsoft?

I can't see Sony being very happy if these leaks are true as it gives ms a chance to go higher, and get the higher spec console out the door.

But if this is a "controlled" leak to bluff the populace and Sony haven't actually firmed the specs and then announce something with better specs come release.

It all just seems a bit iffy.

Plus if ms do go higher. What price point are they going to use. They aren't winning with a lower price now, going back to 499 won't help there cause even if better specced.

As the saying goes:


Interesting times ahead.
 

Reallink

Member
and OG owners get fucked (eventually).

Probably right out of the gate, the launch Neo showpiece's base configuration will probably be 720p-900p with framerate issues. It's not about "downgrading", it's about developers aren't going take the time to pound out optimization.
 

AGoodODST

Member
As someone that has no intention of picking this new model up, I'm a little concerned on how future PS4 games will perform. Do not want a Hyrule Warriors Legends situation.
 
Oh, look, it's a completely conservative upgrade that's nowhere near as extreme as people feared.

Oh, look, a parade of people who can't accept that their PS4 isn't 'the best' anymore. PS4K threads are going to get boring really fast.

Oh, look, it's someone complaining about people complaining, that's new.

As someone that has no intention of picking this new model up, I'm a little concerned on how future PS4 games will perform. Do not want a Hyrule Warriors Legends situation.

As much as people try to claim it wont, it will happen. Devs barely have the time to optimize the game for the only PS4 there is now, you will see Xbox One style downgrades to PS4K new poorly performing preset, games running at 720-900p to PS4Ks 1080p.
 

leroidys

Member
Honestly at this point I'm a lot more interested in (1) form factor (2) OS performance and (3) wifi card than anything having to do with graphics or performance in game.
 
Marketing wise, I think this will appeal to the Hardcore and the VR Enthusiasts.
The Hardcore is easily turned on by higher resolution and details so that would not be at all hard to do.
The casuals will be pushed towards the base model due to it's lower price.

I wonder if there will ever be a time further in the cycle where the base PS4 stops producing and only the NEO is left running due to lower production costs and sales numbers falling or if it will be as rare and elusive as the Xbox One Elite controller that clearly appeals only for the hardcore.
 

IaN_GAF

Member
I have to admit it is kinda awesome seeing Giant Bomb (a website about video games) mentioned on regular ass news sites that aren't usually reporting on games news, or weeks late if they do so.
 
No price was provided, but previous reports indicate that the NEO would sell at $399.
Starting in October, every PS4 game is required to ship with both a “Base Mode” which will run on the currently available PS4 and a “NEO Mode” for use on the new console.
Games running in NEO mode will be able to use the hardware upgrades (and an additional 512 MiB in the memory budget)
The NEO will also support 4K image output, but games themselves are not required to be 4K native.
The NEO will not supplant the current PS4, but will exist alongside of it and use the same user environment.
there will be no NEO-only games, and Sony will not let developers separate NEO users from original PS4 players while playing on PSN.
CPU: 8 Jaguar Cores at 2.1 GHz
GPU: Improved AMD GCN, 36 CUs at 911 MHz
Memory: 8 GB GDDR5, 218 GB/s

You know what - this is all pretty much what I've been expecting/arguing for in other threads. We are now left with 2 important questions:

  1. How long till PS5?
  2. What happens to Neo when PS5 launches?
Basically, I don't mind PS4 being obsoleted at PS5 launch, that's kind of expected, but if PS5 is in the same 3 year time frame then I'd be a wary PS4.5/PS4K/Neo owner if it is also retired at the same time.

That said, I've got no reason to upgrade my PS4 - I'll be staying there and playing the gimped versions of games ;)
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
People are acting like Sony is gonna kick in their door and replace their current PS4 with a pile of shit or something.

The box in your house is the exact same as it was when you bought it. Why assume that every new game coming out will run like shit on the standard PS4? The 30-something million unit install base should be incentive for publishers and devs to make sure new games are running at least decently on the standard unit, no?

That's where the majority of people will be playing their games, why wouldn't devs ensure that they're getting a good experience?

Maybe I'm just being overly optimistic but I just don't see games limping along on the standard PS4 being the norm seeing as how they will still be the biggest console user base.

If anything, the Neo will get the short end of the stick - for the next year or two at least. Devs will rightly focus on the larger install base, or will already have games in development targeted to that spec. Then they'll just turn up some effects or details based on their (likely) PC engine base for neo.
 

The God

Member
We're does this leave Microsoft?

I can't see Sony being very happy if these leaks are true as it gives ms a chance to go higher, and get the higher spec console out the door.

But if this is a "controlled" leak to bluff the populace and Sony haven't actually firmed the specs and then announce something with better specs come release.

It all just seems a bit iffy.

Plus if ms do go higher. What price point are they going to use. They aren't winning with a lower price now, going back to 499 won't help there cause even if better specced.

As the saying goes:


Interesting times ahead.

I'll be shocked if Microsoft doesn't try their hardest to leapfrog this.
 
This makes me so sad. Now I 100% regret buying a PS4 instead of a PC. The whole point is you don't have to upgrade, it's just there. If this is how consoles are going to be from now on, only Nintendo will get my money.

Lol it's still the point, you don't have to upgrade, just look at sony exlusives at the moment they look incredible and run at a rock solid 30fps.
 

Gurish

Member
Just seen this thread, seems like Sony has no choice but to announce the thing in E3, I don't know specs too much, how much powerful NEO is compared to PS4?
 

Greddleok

Member
Oh, look, it's a completely conservative upgrade that's nowhere near as extreme as people feared.

Oh, look, a parade of people who can't accept that their PS4 isn't 'the best' anymore. PS4K threads are going to get boring really fast.

Why shouldn't people be upset? A lot of people bought this system because of what consoles have always been, only to be told that oops, the business model has changed, after purchasing it, after generating a catalogue of games.

If I was told upfront that the PS4 would have iterations, I would have avoided it. Sony can go get fucked.
 

anothertech

Member
Lord help me. That CPU allows those GPUs to scale because it is so powerful as to remove CPU bottlenecks from the equation.

In pure GPU bound scenarios of course changing the gpu will scale frame rate, but under many real world conditions that is likely not the case, especially with the weaker CPUs in consoles.
Ok yes I get this. They always test gpus this way as to avoid bottlenecks. And the amount of fps difference in these scenarios will not scale exactly as in the diagram. That is true.

My point that I feel is being missed over and over, is that people here are arguing the unconfirmed spec increase will make little to no difference in fps performance, when that is in my opinion just an obtuse view of it all plain and simple.

It is possible, probable even that doubling the gpu performance this way will get us to 60fps in most cases with the games optimized specifically for this set up in a closed environment.
 
This makes me so sad. Now I 100% regret buying a PS4 instead of a PC. The whole point is you don't have to upgrade, it's just there. If this is how consoles are going to be from now on, only Nintendo will get my money.

I'd be shocked if Nintendo doesn't have the exact same strategy with NX.

Consoles are going to be iterative moving forward. Best to accept it now.
 
I doubt we'll be seeing that much better performance, since most devs are not going to want to spend a ton of time optimizing for the new hardware to truly take advantage.

The capability is there on paper, but as you said it all comes down to how developers use it. Personally, I don't see there being much in the way of resources, time, and financial incentive to optimize for two PS4 formats, even if they're somewhat similar. This goes double considering they won't see a considerable bump in their sales to justify the extra resources required on their part.

Taking FF15 as an example, Square Enix is already spending a ton of time and effort trying to get their engine to run decently on current-gen hardware. They're gonna keep optimizing up until the very end, and even still I don't foresee a rock solid 30 FPS out of the game. To add a Neo performance profile on TOP of everything that they're doing? I'm willing to be a lot of devs will not focus on it at all, since they're required to ship on regular PS4 as well. Post-launch performance patches I can see being a thing for devs under a time crunch (aka most of them), but still, do people really want to buy another console to wait longer post-launch to get a customized performance profile for marginally better performance? I guess if people have money to burn or they're completely new PS4 adopters in which case the profile will be just gravy, but otherwise I don't think it'll be worth it at the end of the day.

SE will just use that extra power for 30fps, better effects and brute force it .
And for me and others that well worth the money (will sell old PS4 and buy a new one).
FFXV on current gen could really use better frame rate and AA.
 

FyreWulff

Member
Just seen this thread, seems like Sony has no choice but to announce the thing in E3, I don't know specs too much, how much powerful NEO is compared to PS4?

It's like the DSi to the DS. Except developers apparently are not allowed to have games that only run on the newer refresh, unlike the DSi (and it'd probably have about as many as the DSi if it did)
 
We are now left with 2 important questions:

  1. How long till PS5?
  2. What happens to Neo when PS5 launches?
You forgot "will there even be a PS5?"

Why make a PS5 when you can roll out new backwards compatible Playstations with more powerful hardware every few years? The new one becomes the performance model and the older one becomes the budget model and the cycle continues.
 
You know what - this is all pretty much what I've been expecting/arguing for in other threads. We are now left with 2 important questions:

  1. How long till PS5?
  2. What happens to Neo when PS5 launches?

Basically, I don't mind PS4 being obsoleted at PS5 launch, that's kind of expected, but if PS5 is in the same 3 year time frame then I'd be a wary PS4.5/PS4K/Neo owner if it is also retired at the same time.

Cross-gen support for a couple of years just like any other generation.
 

spons

Gold Member
Sounds like a waste of time and money for everybody involved. Without exclusives I don't see a reason for this "PS4K" to exist, at all.

Unless Sony believes their minor spec superiority compared to the Xbox One is the reason they're selling so well and they're pushing this to the extreme with a new iteration.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
Games running in NEO mode will be able to use t









You know what - this is all pretty much what I've been expecting/arguing for in other threads. We are now left with 2 important questions:

  1. How long till PS5?
  2. What happens to Neo when PS5 launches?

Basically, I don't mind PS4 being obsoleted at PS5 launch, that's kind of expected, but if PS5 is in the same 3 year time frame then I'd be a wary PS4.5/PS4K/Neo owner if it is also retired at the same time.


I'd bet 3-4 years. Maybe 10nm with HBM2 to give time for another shrink,mode maturity and another architectural evolution.
 

DieH@rd

Banned
This looks like a great mid-gen bump, sticking to the same [but overclocked] CPU/RAM to retain compatibility, and providing much better GPU module. Having access to 36CU Radeon will do wonders to games, both old and new!

I still would prefer much more capable CPU, but at least with this move I fully expect PS4K to cost $400€ which is great for consumers.


Indeed. :D

How much does a 500 mhz bump help the CPU?

Neo has 31% faster CPU. If a game was CPU bound, 30fps game could be rendered at ~40fps [without any optimizations]. Little smaller draw distance, little less physics calculations... and with a bit of optimizations 60fps is withing the reach. But not all devs will be interested in that.

What I see happening most of the time is that base PS4 games will run at 1080p30/60 same as now, and PS4K games will just bump it to 1440p which will enable better upscaled picture for 4K TV users and awesome "downsampled" IQ for 1080p TV users.


Just seen this thread, seems like Sony has no choice but to announce the thing in E3, I don't know specs too much, how much powerful NEO is compared to PS4?
~31% faster CPU
110%+ faster GPU
overclocked RAM
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
The clock speed figure kinda makes me think that Giant Bomb is getting trolled. 911? Really? 9/11... disaster, tragedy...

Funny how these specs at $399 are totally possible for Sony, but completely absurd in the NX threads for Nintendo to come out with anything anywhere near 2x the power of ps4 at a reasonable price point by a ton of posters in there. Lol.

Nintendo isn't going to release a $400 console.
NX will likely have an expensive (relative to Sony and MS) controller gimmick.
Nintendo loves them some hardware profits.

I doubt it will output at 1440p, there will be people who use the new console on 1080p TVs and I'm not sure that a downscaled image would look good.

1440p downscaled to 1080p looks very noticeably better than native 1080p.
 
I'd be shocked if Nintendo doesn't have the exact same strategy with NX.

Consoles are going to be iterative moving forward. Best to accept it now.

They should have been up front about it so people who do not want to accept it don't buy into the ecosystem.

1440p downscaled to 1080p looks very noticeably better than native 1080p.

Supersampled yes, but if it outputs at 1440p and is then downscaled by a chip you are going to get artifacts.
 

-hadouken

Member
But how do you get that message across to consumers in a coherent way to those who aren't the die hard performance chasing crowd?

I know they aren't the target audience but they'll be confused by all this.
I'd usually agree, tho I'm guessing they'll call it the 4K. It's an easy marketing strategy that will sell to enthusiasts (and the average Joe who has money to spend) without pissing off people who are unfazed by higher end gear.
 
Top Bottom