stan423321
Member
Honestly this would have been way funnier if the journalist just told us about embargo embargo without breaking it.
They are at Rockstar levels of trying to hide the game from the public.
This isn't new.
At least, according to Giant Bomb's Jeff Gerstmann.
But is there an embargo on the lack of an embargo embargo? If so he just broke embargo for breaking the embargo embargo embargo, Bethesdas lawyers are coming.there's no embargo on the embargo embargo, he just cant tell us when they plan to run their review
giant bomb is your god or something?
Publishers really want those 'gamers go into the store and buy a game based on the boxart' days back.
what secrecy? this is common. theres been gameplay footage since e3. theres been no downgradeathon. no major gameplay questions unasnwered. they've been pretty upfront about the game. I'd just imagine a game with 11k dialogue lines must be pretty story heavy, so i'd imagine they want to stop it from getting out (which seems to already have failed).
But is there an embargo on the lack of an embargo embargo? If so he just broke embargo for breaking the embargo embargo embargo, Bethesdas lawyers are coming.
Am I the only one who doesn't give a flying crap?
Hell yeah they are. All we get from their games are trailers. Then a trickle of screenshots. It was way late, just weeks before GTA V that we finally saw more than the few trailers in motion and heard of the press getting to try itRockstar is nowhere near this secretive.
But doesn't the existence of this very thread basically says "FUCK YOU" to this embargo to embargo?
Except this is the first time I've seen it, and it's the first time Jason's seen it according to the article. It certainly isn't common. What other games did this?
e: Obviously embargoes aren't new, I'm referring to an embargo on the embargo.
yeah I editied to reflect that. I still don't think its that big of a deal. I feel like this probably happens more than Kotaku is letting on but because its Fallout 4 and they recieved an official press thing about it vs. just being told not to by the pub, they want to take off with it.
Nice edit.This is gross and terrible.
I'm sorry, but I guess you haven't been paying attention to the leaks. There's plenty of basic gameplay information we've only just found out in the past few days.
there's no embargo on the embargo embargo, he just cant tell us when they plan to run their review
Please don't make a post like this without providing examples.
I'm sorry, but I guess you haven't been paying attention to the leaks. There's plenty of basic gameplay information we've only just found out in the past few days.
Nice edit.
Yes.
You are the only living person to not care about this.
You are a special snowflake.
Go you!
Publishers really want those 'gamers go into the store and buy a game based on the boxart' days back.
It's 2015, Bethesda. The ending of your game is already floating around the net, streamers give no damn, try to find a better solution than to hide your cards even more.
But is there an embargo on the lack of an embargo embargo? If so he just broke embargo for breaking the embargo embargo embargo, Bethesdas lawyers are coming.
No matter how many times it has happened before (embargoes for embargoes aren't nearly as common as you'd think), the situation is still completely anti-consumer, but pro-corporation. They build the hype, regardless of how warranted it is or not, and use this to mask any development issues before launch. Kind of sad we have to rely on leaks just to hear or see the truth when it comes to game launches these days.
fuckin' why
From what I've heard, Bethesda is extremely NDA happy
So with their next game will it be a loop of embargoing embargoes or can one self embargo in the second or third embargo. Can an embargo embargo itself? Will the embargo gain sentience if it self embargoes?
Because much of Zenimax Media's board and upper management have lawyer backgrounds.