-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
IGN: Dark Soul 3 confirmed real by leaked promo art - Early 2016
- Thread starter piccio_ssl
- Start date
I think people pretend the other annualized series were always bad games because it makes things easier. Understanding that before those series were driven into the ground people really liked them is scary because it makes it clear the same can happen here.
Who tells this game is rushed. We don't know where development started.
Bloodborne is not Dark Souls 3. And even if you count it, it's not different from what From did with the King Field series (precursor of the Soul series).
It's nothing new for From anualizing it's series. The problem is not that, the problem is when you can't maintaint the quality. So far From archieved that with the Souls games and Bloodborne.
Iva Demilcol
Member
Nice .
Uno Venova
Banned
That's only bad with franchises I don't like.
Arby 'n' the Chief
Member
prepare my sunbros
FaintDeftone
Junior Member
Razzorn34
Member
Which really does suck. This apparently this will be the B team again.
I would rather wait longer to get games that are guaranteed to be higher quality, with the team I know will do it right.
TheGreatLugia
Banned
I was expecting mid-late 2016.
DrROBschiz
Member
Well even if there are no surprises left (there are) we still get lots of footage and info
Its going to be a great E3 and a great year once again for games. And 2016 as well its looking like
Freedom = $1.05
Banned
well, that just means that I can expect the Dark Souls 2 prices to finally drop to a decent level in the Steam summer sale
Relaxed Muscle
Member
Early 2016?
B Team confirmed.
B Team confirmed.
DrROBschiz
Member
Not feeling it yet myself but then again Ive been jumping around between lots of games
Also Dark Souls 2 and BB were different enough to scratch different gaming itches for me
Cant wait
benicillin
Banned
I could believe that this hits early 2016. I can't imagine that the whole DS2 team was busy with Scholar of the First sin, it was a relatively straightforward port.
From Software is huge now so they have different teams working on separate games. The DS2 team has worked on it since DS2 shipped i reckon with a smaller team porting it to next gen.
Here's for NO MORE LAST GEN PLEASE.
Lurgan1337
Banned
damn yeah. And I thought I lost reasons to live after MGS v release
So does this mean Dark Souls has become the non-Miyazaki series, relegated to the B-team?
I honestly don't feel like they've had enough time to craft an experience that lives up to the name. The burden on proof is on them to convince me they have, but until then, I'm pretty turned off by the annualization.
I honestly don't feel like they've had enough time to craft an experience that lives up to the name. The burden on proof is on them to convince me they have, but until then, I'm pretty turned off by the annualization.
It's Dark Souls 3. Of course it's gonna have references from the older games. There's still an on-going story in the Dark universe.
Rumor says this is a Miyazaki game. I don't think that hard to believe he worked on both, it's not like Miyazaki has been on Bloodborne till release date.
Thank you, good sir. It's all I wanted.
because some people dont have a PS4 and this overall idea of "OMG WE JUST HAD A SOULS GAME ITS TOO SOON" is incredibly arrogant because it assumes all those souls fans played or have access to BB.
I know at least 2 people that love the Souls games and cant play BB and are happy as shit about this
Or people who are fans of the series would rather get excited for a new game in the series than be pessimistic whiners? There's no direct correlation between people celebrating DS3 announcement and people bashing annualised franchises, if there is I'd like to see it, maybe in this thread for starters.
Newtype-001
Member
Bloodborne dlc then dark souls 3 im fucking hypppppppoeddd.
BB was an OK game, but it was no DS1. As long as DS3 doesn't adopt BB's simplistic approach to player builds, I'll be very happy.
SargerusBR
I love Pokken!
Why are people assuming Miyazaki isn't directing when insiders are claiming he is?
KZXcellent
Member
I don't see a problem with the release pattern of the souls games. It only seems often thanks to Bloodborne which isn't apart of the Souls series. In the end it shouldn't matter if there's a new one every year so long as they are polished and good games. It's when they release broken and terrible that there is a problem.
That and I prefer variety in builds/classes and BB doesn't offer that like Souls does.
That and I prefer variety in builds/classes and BB doesn't offer that like Souls does.
To each his own but it does make the wait for the next Berserk chapter easier.
Pie and Beans
Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
Waaaaay too soon, and explains why it looks more like a cobbled together expansion than anything new and fresh.
Damn, feels bad son
What was once this fresh new dynamic series is into the disappointing milk zone already.
Damn, feels bad son
What was once this fresh new dynamic series is into the disappointing milk zone already.
Dragon Puncher
Member
Hopefully it's great, but early 2016 just makes me even more certain that this is more of a Dark Souls 2.5. I want a big sequel, with lots of changes and this seems like it will mostly just be more of the same.
I don't want Assassins Creed style annualization to ruin the Soul's games.
I don't want Assassins Creed style annualization to ruin the Soul's games.
CountAntonius
Member
Looking forward to it.