1.21Gigawatts
Banned
But seriously, why do devs keep releasing day one patch for a game that has "gone" gold?
Because they do stuff between gold and release.
But seriously, why do devs keep releasing day one patch for a game that has "gone" gold?
Based on these images, the image quality for the XB1 version of this game is garbage. Games like Halo 4 had much, much clearer IQ.
http://i.minus.com/ibnlvFuaZjb932.png[/MG][/QUOTE]
Some AA would do wonders here, but apparently is that just too much for the XB1
Uhhh... What? He didn't "imply" anything, he specifically stated at least two things about the same game, both of which were completely false. And then doubled down when confronted.
How is that not wrong? That makes as much sense as me posting "Infamous SS will be 720p". Would that fall under the "keeping attention on resolution" defense as well?
Some AA would do wonders here, but apparently is that just too much for the XB1
The OP is incomprehensible.
Am I to understand someone got banned because they got it wrong by 92 pixels?
As for the whole topic of bans. I agree that banning someone with a great track record for a few misses would be ridiculous. The problem in this case was that he wasn't leaking information where there was none (which is the usual case). Respawn had already offered the information that the resolution was currently 792p, and that the alpha textures were not final. CBOAT in this instance was saying that the information offered directly by the developer of the game was wrong (or basically, that they were lying). This is different, and not something I've seen other leakers such as Thuway, FamousMortimer and the like ever do. For this reason I feel at least a temporary ban is justified.
We need a CBOAT here in Neogaf, he is very important and a trust insider. If somebody wants CBOAT ban, for such minimal error. Its because wants to keep blind about the XBO reality. Or you considered all the CBOAT leaks fakes, only for this. This is not a game, waiting that a Insiders fails, to reclaim his head. Cmon, what a Joke.
He stated those two things with an intention to imply that the game would fail to live up to the hype performance-wise, and would thus be a victim of, or contributor to, the ongoing Resolutiongate. He doubled down when confronted because he genuinely believed that the game was failing to, and would fail to, meet the expected trappings of a next gen game.
Now, if you said that inFamous SS would be 720p, then yes, people would end up paying attention to that game's resolution and rightfully so. And if all Sucker Punch could muster up was a measly 72p, then I think we would be agreeing that you were close enough, give or take a few minor technicalities. CBoaT was close enough, and 792p isn't 720p but it sure isn't 900p either.
Before Beta:
After beta was 792p and better textures than alpha:
This wasn't about 72 pixels. OP should add this, so people know what the topic is about.
pure ps fanboy dude
Once again, he said this after the beta was in 792p saying that the final game would be downgraded from the beta. That was the bigger reason why what he said got attention from a decent amount of people here.
It's not about a mere "72p". He said the final game would be downgraded from the beta.
pure ps fanboy dude
What kind of AA is applied? Maybe that is the cause of the vaseline.
MSAA x2
It brings up questions as to whether cboat has ulterior motives.The OP is incomprehensible.
Am I to understand someone got banned because they got it wrong by 92 pixels?
Screw that, who is that in your avatar?!?!Xone9
Junior Member
(Today, 07:02 PM)
You were saying?
So if you could go ahead and include my third and final paragraph from that post you quoted, you would see the part where I said it would be nice if CBoaT wasn't banned right now from explaining why he believed that not only the textures but the resolution as well would downgrade. The guy wouldn't concede to being wrong, even with clear evidence staring him in the face, but something he knew kept him from flinching and now he's not being afforded the opportunity to make amends for at least 72 hours.
He certainly has posterior motives.It brings up questions as to whether cboat has ulterior motives.
I didn't see you mention the Titanfall beta resolution in your post at all (just the textures). My mistake if that's what you meant.
Looks pretty good from 10fts away...
Anyway, Day One patch is 840mb for TF.
720-->792 patch amirite?
But seriously, why do devs keep releasing day one patch for a game that has "gone" gold?
We're good, thanks for explaining.
Is that really you in your avatar?
Yes. Kept it since last year's "real pic January" or w/e.
It's hard to tell astroturfers from dedicated fans, so it's hard to say whether their post history is damning or not. It's always funny that anyone who points out anything that could be seen as potentially negative or critical is "othered" as a "PS fanboy" (even when it couldn't be further from the truth).Xone9
Junior Member
(Today, 07:02 PM)
You were saying?
Yeah I'm hype I Cant wait....This is the flagship system seller? lmao
Are these really direct-feed shots OP? Because they look horrible. Even the AA looks bad here, might be due to the lower resolution =/
IMHO it wasn't really that good and honestly I think the only reason people are excited for the game is because it offers something new in the sense of FPS genre. I played at a friends house and honestly it got old after a few hours. But, he'll tell you that he loved it up until the moment the beta ended.
Looks pretty good from 10fts away...
Anyway, Day One patch is 840mb for TF.
720-->792 patch amirite?
But seriously, why do devs keep releasing day one patch for a game that has "gone" gold?
As someone who saw this constantly for 4 years and knows the whole intro back and forth:
BEST GIF EVER
I died at "is that bish again?"
So it is fanboism to point out the facts now?!
Agreed on that front. Bumping it to 792p when you still have framerate issues, tearing, and other small visual bugs makes no sense to me. How could you even justify it? Do any tv's even support 792p? Doesn't 720p scale to 1080p better, anyway? I'm honestly curious to the answers, so someone with technical knowledge please enlighten me.
It's 72 more p's. Sounds better.Anyone?
If a 3 day ban is what's been issued in the past for similar issues, I have no problem with this. If it's not in line with what's been issued in the past, I have massive problems with this.
Also, I like the way Titanfall looks.
Its funny. In Titanfall for my Xbox one, i was too busy dodging bullets, parkouring, running around and killing other players to notice the graphics. Different priorities i guess.
I am sure MS knows who Cboat is or atleast has an idea.
Its funny. In Titanfall for my Xbox one, i was too busy dodging bullets, parkouring, running around and killing other players to notice the graphics. Different priorities i guess.
I am sure MS knows who Cboat is or atleast has an idea.
People love how Dark Souls looks but that's not saying much, if at all.
Its funny. In Titanfall for my Xbox one, i was too busy dodging bullets, parkouring, running around and killing other players to notice the graphics. Different priorities i guess.