• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Titanfall retail screencaps (XB1) show 792p resolution? CBoaT ;_;

Status
Not open for further replies.
What if the resolution WAS 720p and the textures WERE alpha but Respawn wanted CBoaT dead so they changed it all at the last minute?

This shit is straight out of some deviantart fan-fiction. Do you really think a developer would do that just because they want to kill some random internet figure that only GAF knows? Please.
 
Looks like WiiU to me.

When you look at a game running on your screen fully blown and running high res textures, then the story changes.


I can look at some Knack screens and believe it's a Wii U game, but after playing it and seeing all the intense physics, I know it can't happen on the Wii U. Same thing applies here. The Wii U version of TitanFall would probably be comparable to the Xbox 360 version if they ever made one. I'd be curious to see how the 360 version turns out by the way.
 
So BF4 runs better and has a higher resolution than this game, on the Xbox One? And can have a lot more going on at a time? What a joke, they should've gone with Frostbite, though I know they did Source for the PS3.

forstbite has godawful netcode,so it's useless for multiplayer shooters too, pretty graphics or not
 

Gestault

Member
But why is it 792p? Someone clearly cares about not being labeled 720p.

I feel like assuming the decision to have a game running at a higher resolution is because of an inferiority complex is trying a little too hard. I think it's likely that it's the highest resolution they could get with the performance they wanted.
 

Sublyminal

Neo Member
This shit is straight out of some deviantart fan-fiction. Do you really think a developer would do that just because they want to kill some random internet figure that only GAF knows? Please.


Why not? You do know that Bioware changed the ME3 ending when they script was leaked right? Just because you think it's fan fiction type shit, doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
 

StuBurns

Banned
I feel like assuming the decision to have a game running at a higher resolution is because of an inferiority complex is trying a little too hard. I think it's likely that it's the highest resolution they could get with the performance they wanted.
I don't think that's true.

The beta had plenty of screentear, and taxed performance, the visual bump from 720p isn't significant, they should have dropped it down, I think they would have had 'resolutiongate' not happened.
 

Synth

Member
This shit is straight out of some deviantart fan-fiction. Do you really think a developer would do that just because they want to kill some random internet figure that only GAF knows? Please.

I can picture it now. The devs at Respawn are sitting at their desks browsing GAF when they stumble across CBOAT leaking that the alpha textures are final. At this point they panic, and decide that they have no choice but to put the non-shit textures back in quickly.

It just makes too much sense.
 

LNBL

Member
Here in the netherlands, some gaming stores are buying up german stock of XB1's to sell.

Too bad no-one seems to be interested in buying them here either. PS4's still sold out until late april.

Partly due to the fact that they are priced around €570, people are not that stupid thankfully.
 
I'm kind of amazed Microsoft even wanted this game to be a flagship exclusive. It really doesn't do the platform any favors. Maybe they expected it would look a little better in the end.
 
I feel like assuming the decision to have a game running at a higher resolution is because of an inferiority complex is trying a little too hard. I think it's likely that it's the highest resolution they could get with the performance they wanted.

And if the beta is anything to go by, they still failed to lock down 60fps consistently. It would be disappointing if the full game has those drops as well. (Someone would still defend it though.)

It's a weird resolution to go with considering it doesn't improve the iq of the game in any meaningful way.
 

Gestault

Member
I don't think that's true.

The beta had plenty of screentear, and taxed performance, the visual bump from 720p isn't significant, they should have dropped it down, I think they would have had 'resolutiongate' not happened.

We'll have a good sense of that with the retail release. If they have it at the incrementally higher resolution alongside the same performance quirks in the final game, I'd definitely agree with you. I sort of have a feeling it's something they worked out already, post-beta.
 
So. I Dont get it. People are considering the CBOAT leak fake or what?. Is 792p is a big deal or something? For me, this is only a confirmation. And is hard to believe that the XBO cant handle the old source engine at 1080p.
 
I'm kind of amazed Microsoft even wanted this game to be a flagship exclusive. It really doesn't do the platform any favors. Maybe they expected it would look a little better in the end.

Luckily for MS it's actually a game, and not a bunch of stills. The launch trailer showing all kinds of crazy action, and the word of mouth from the beta, will sell more systems than those screenshots methinks.
 
So. I Dont get it. People are considering the CBOAT leak fake or what?. Is 792p is a big deal or something? For me, this is only a confirmation. And is hard to believe that the XBO cant handle the old source engine at 1080p.

It might be the source engine but I doubt it's anything like it was back in 2006, just like how cod ghosts is still quake 3 yet runs shit also, it;s all the extras they tackle on and things the engine probably never intended to do.
 

Synth

Member
I'm kind of amazed Microsoft even wanted this game to be a flagship exclusive. It really doesn't do the platform any favors. Maybe they expected it would look a little better in the end.

What if... it was more important to them not to have a PS4 version exist for comparison?... D:

So. I Dont get it. People are considering the CBOAT leak fake or what?. Is 792p is a big deal or something? For me, this is only a confirmation. And is hard to believe that the XBO cant handle the old source engine at 1080p.

Confirmation of what exactly? Basically everything he said about Titanfall has turned out wrong so far. The textures aren't the same as the alpha, the private chat isn't a bespoke implementation, it's not 720p (the difference between 720 and 792 is unimportant here, it was already at 792 and he claimed a downgrade from that). So what exactly does this confirm for you?
 

Sublyminal

Neo Member
Luckily for MS it's actually a game, and not a bunch of stills. The launch trailer showing all kinds of crazy action, and the word of mouth from the beta, will sell more systems than those screenshots methinks.

I don't think so, not considering the fact that the system is still $500. That is what has kept me from jumping on board. I'm not a big fan of spending half a G on a console I'll play for one, maybe two games.
 

jaypah

Member
I suppose you're right, but, again, it does happen and very very often. Am I saying that Respawn is this vindictive? Nope, but come on, 72 extra p? Little sheist if you ask me.

So you think it's even plausible that they were going to ship with the textures from the alpha but instead increased them, just to spite CBOAT? Don't lose your grip homie.
 

Sublyminal

Neo Member
So you think it's even plausible that they were going to ship with the textures from the alpha but instead increased them, just to spite CBOAT? Don't lose your grip homie.

Hell no that alpha texture shit was retarded of CBOAT to say. I'm saying resolution wise, though, you never know.
 

watership

Member
I'm kind of amazed Microsoft even wanted this game to be a flagship exclusive. It really doesn't do the platform any favors. Maybe they expected it would look a little better in the end.

Because it plays amazing? Is this game really so offensive to the eyes that the fact it might a game people actually love to play is lost on everyone else?
 
I don't think that's true.

The beta had plenty of screentear, and taxed performance, the visual bump from 720p isn't significant, they should have dropped it down, I think they would have had 'resolutiongate' not happened.

Agreed on that front. Bumping it to 792p when you still have framerate issues, tearing, and other small visual bugs makes no sense to me. How could you even justify it? Do any tv's even support 792p? Doesn't 720p scale to 1080p better, anyway? I'm honestly curious to the answers, so someone with technical knowledge please enlighten me.
 

ypo

Member
Why 792p? What kind of weird res is that? I hope at least they sorted the framerate.

Maybe they went a bit higher because the 360 port is coming in at 720p?

Yea makes zero sense considering that there's quite bit of framerate issue and the fact it's extremely difficult to tell the difference between 720p and 792p. It's like they sacrificed better framerate performance just so the game doesn't get the 720p label.
 

Sublyminal

Neo Member
Because it plays amazing? Is this game really so offensive to the eyes that the fact it might a game people actually love to play is lost on everyone else?

IMHO it wasn't really that good and honestly I think the only reason people are excited for the game is because it offers something new in the sense of FPS genre. I played at a friends house and honestly it got old after a few hours. But, he'll tell you that he loved it up until the moment the beta ended.
 

Sublyminal

Neo Member
It was all part of the same package. Alpha textures, 720p, no Xbox live party chat. That was the claim I think.


Ahh, well I didn't read the thread, so I assumed it was all about the 720p claim. Anyone who thinks devs are going to leave in alpha textures though are off their meds.
 

Gestault

Member
IMHO it wasn't really that good and honestly I think the only reason people are excited for the game is because it offers something new in the sense of FPS genre. I played at a friends house and honestly it got old after a few hours. But, he'll tell you that he loved it up until the moment the beta ended.

It sounds like you didn't like it but he did? Sorry, it just seemed dismissive the way you phrased it.
 

Sublyminal

Neo Member
It sounds like you didn't like it but he did? Sorry, it just seemed dismissive the way you phrased it.

Typing from my phone, forgive me. He loved it, I liked it but didn't love it. I could see myself playing it for about two or three months (much like I did Ghostz) and then be done with it.
 
It was all part of the same package. Alpha textures, 720p, no Xbox live party chat. That was the claim I think.

Yep. And it's not just that he said it would be 720p, he said directly that it wasn't 792p. So it's not just, Oh I heard it would be 720p, and it turned out to be slightly wrong. I picked up a 1 week ban (I deserved it) before for insulting another member, so it's definitely weird seeing a 3 day ban for something that is normally considered a permaban. But tbh I have no horse in this race, I don't think cBoat will be posting much either, so it doesn't really make much of a difference anyway. I think it's a good standard at GAF that insiders have accountability so they don't abuse their position.
 

Gestault

Member
Based on these images, the image quality for the XB1 version of this game is garbage. Games like Halo 4 had much, much clearer IQ.

ibnlvFuaZjb932.png
 
ooops

792-720 = 72

me no math

Before Beta:
cBoat said:
Tintnfall - 16 maaps fo laucnh, bxone alph a textures ARE fin@l assets #1
wha it says in the tile. PC rev wil hva impve textures n thatsit. n0 wrd on blupint/360 sku yet, stil trying. Wil update sa see fit.




duelin leakrs!11!! or wokng together?! ITISAMYSTEY

After beta was 792p and better textures than alpha:
cBoat said:
720 as wel , 792? no.

stick in toMy gun s on alpha texture POSTi mad be4, btway
s

This wasn't about 72 pixels. OP should add this, so people know what the topic is about.
 

KukicAdo

Neo Member
I find it funny that instead of 720p. It's 792p... 72p more.. Must be some type of inside joke or nod to the gaming community. That resolution is just way too unique to not be.
 

fedexpeon

Banned
Based on these images, the image quality for the XB1 version of this game is garbage. Games like Halo 4 had much, much clearer IQ.

Looks pretty good from 10fts away...

Anyway, Day One patch is 840mb for TF.
720-->792 patch amirite?
But seriously, why do devs keep releasing day one patch for a game that has "gone" gold?
 
What if... it was more important to them not to have a PS4 version exist for comparison?... D:



Confirmation of what exactly? Basically everything he said about Titanfall has turned out wrong so far. The textures aren't the same as the alpha, the private chat isn't a bespoke implementation, it's not 720p (the difference between 720 and 792 is unimportant here, it was already at 792 and he claimed a downgrade from that). So what exactly does this confirm for you?

We need a CBOAT here in Neogaf, he is very important and a trust insider. If somebody wants CBOAT ban, for such minimal error. Its because wants to keep blind about the XBO reality. Or you considered all the CBOAT leaks fakes, only for this. This is not a game, waiting that a Insiders fails, to reclaim his head. Cmon, what a Joke.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom