• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Actress Daniele Watts reported for lewd acts, goes nuts at police investigating

Status
Not open for further replies.

.GqueB.

Banned
She stated in that CNN interview, that she knew she could've resolved the situation easily, but stayed hard headed on purpose to make a point for black people, because she saw herself in the position of being a hero by resisting.

She thinks that we would champion someone for staying hard-headed/difficult on purpose? Strange conclusion to draw.
 
I read the first few pages and then skipped to the end.

I clearly missed a grand revelation somewhere.

TMZ audio was released, turns out the actress was lying on SEVERAL accounts: There were multiple complaints of her having sex with her boyfriend in their car, with the door open, in public view. The police responded to the complaints, but by that time, she and her bf had apparently 'finished' and wiped themselves off with tissue. The police officer asked her for some ID, she called her daddy and tried to put him on the phone with the officer (lol), accused the officer of racially profiling her, tried to walk away when he was detaining her, and basically acted like an entitled, obnoxious brat.

The officer, on the other hand, was extremely cool under pressure and handled things very well, though you could tell he was pretty annoyed. He put her in handcuffs because she tried to leave while he was still questioning her, but he did not arrest her (as some folks have stated).

TBH, looking at the wreckage the first few pages of this thread created, I can kind of see why people on GAF might hesitate to speak their honest opinions, even if they do it respectfully. I would have been on the side of Daniele Watts, fwiw, but wow...people got banned just for saying they wanted to wait until more information got released. Kind of shameful.
 
jumping to conclusions is always bad. It's a powerful tool that opressed (or rather, that are part of a minority and/or oppressed group) people can use, unlike those with privilege. I only can hope this opens the eyes of those who see everything as black or white without giving the other side a chance (pun not intended). Without the audio record, many would still believe it happened because similar (and worse things happened).

You know what's the name of that? Prejudice. And racism is inherently founded on prejudice on most cases.
 

Darklord

Banned
Whoa, this certainly had a 180 turn of events. She sounded like Hilary from the Fresh Prince the way she was going off.
 

.GqueB.

Banned
TBH, looking at the wreckage the first few pages of this thread created, I can kind of see why people on GAF might hesitate to speak their honest opinions, even if they do it respectfully. I would have been on the side of Daniele Watts, fwiw, but wow...people got banned just for saying they wanted to wait until more information got released. Kind of shameful.

To be fair, some of those are unrelated. I know at least one is.
 
lol putting your dad on the phone with the cops

I didn't know she actually called her dad. From a quote I saw earlier "Daddy they don't want to talk to you" I assumed she was playing up the prostitute thing and calling her boyfriend daddy. Although after reading the thread more. Where did the whole prostitute angle come from?
 

methane47

Member
This is why we need recording devices on every police officer.
Every situation can be judged so quickly and dealt with so easily.
 
To be fair, some of those are unrelated. I know at least one is.

Oh, I didn't check what other posts the banned folks had written, so you are right, but the number of bans can't all be coincidental, right? :/ :\

I didn't know she actually called her dad. From a quote I saw earlier "Daddy they don't want to talk to you" I assumed she was playing up the prostitute thing and calling her boyfriend daddy. Although after reading the thread more. Where did the whole prostitute angle come from?

She and her boyfriend pulled it out of their asses.
 

watershed

Banned
Wow, what a turn of events. She's an idiot for trying to make herself into a martyr. But this is a victory for more police recording practices.
 
The officer, on the other hand, was extremely cool under pressure and handled things very well, though you could tell he was pretty annoyed. He put her in handcuffs because she tried to leave while he was still questioning her, but he did not arrest her (as some folks have stated.

Has lawyer GAF chimed in on the bolded bits yet? I might be wrong but I thought handcuffed + not free to leave = arrested. It's more than an investigative Terry stop at that point, right?
 
Has lawyer GAF chimed in on the bolded bits yet? I might be wrong but I thought handcuffed/not free to leave = arrested.

She was detained, not arrested. Arrested would mean she was taken to the station, booked, etc. Detained means the police stopped her, questioned her, and then let her go.
 

spwolf

Member
Remember, this was while she was still controlling the narrative. She didn't know the police were recording at this point.

I wish the interviewer on CNN had played some of that audio and asked her to respond.

I noticed that Jezebel, Gawker, and the other hack sites like HuffPo haven't bothered to update the story now that more facts have come out.

I feel sorry for those police officers. Hopefully the people around them know what really went down.
 
If this conversation wasn't recorded and we only had the cop's word - how would you respond to someone who said they didn't believe her story?
 

Velcro Fly

Member
I read the article on this on CNN at work today, expecting the worst. What I found was a cop who kept his cool and a person who did everything imaginable to escalate the situation. I'm really glad for cops that wear recording devices so shit like this gets sorted out how it should.
 
If this conversation wasn't recorded and we only had the cop's word - how would you respond to someone who said they didn't believe her story?

Let's be honest, they probably would have been permabanned.

And if there hadn't been a recording, I would probably not believe the police officers either. That's the state of the country we live in these days. It's genuinely heartbreaking.
 

CrankyJay

Banned
I read the article on this on CNN at work today, expecting the worst. What I found was a cop who kept his cool and a person who did everything imaginable to escalate the situation. I'm really glad for cops that wear recording devices so shit like this gets sorted out how it should.

It really is the best solution for everyone involved.
 

Chariot

Member
Hero?

She use that word to describe herself?

What an idiot.

She thinks that we would champion someone for staying hard-headed/difficult on purpose? Strange conclusion to draw.
No, she didn't say 'hero', that was me interpreting her words, I apologize to not make that clear. I will write her exact words out so there will less further misinformation.

Timestamp: 9:30

CNN: "You gave your ID to Brian [her husband], he gave it to the police. You see if you had done that earlier... it, it might not have escalated this far?"

Mrs. Watts: "I certainly understand that, but I do again feel part of my role as a public figure is to raise awareness and be strong enough to say and do the things that people who don't have the advantages of that I have, aren't strong enough or don't have the know-how, don't have the awareness to do. So because I'm aware of the history of our country, I, I've went to college. I've studied the law. I've studied ... you know, err, ... this sort of situations. For me standing up for this constitutional right was a gift in and a blessing that I got the opportunity to do that. Because now there is now some kid that goes through the same thing that doesn't have the same opportunity to talk to the news the way I do. And that kid can watch this and go: 'you know what, I don't have to be afraid of police officers anymore, because I live in a country that says that we're free.'"
 

lexi

Banned
Oh cool, now we can ignore the rest of the institutional racism in policing. I was worried there for a second, glad we're back to the status quo.
 
Let's be honest, they probably would have been permabanned.

And if there hadn't been a recording, I would probably not believe the police officers either. That's the state of the country we live in these days. It's genuinely heartbreaking.

Well, until we read the police report. When I first checked the thread no one was really discussing the fact that the cops were answering a call.

Oh cool, now we can ignore the rest of the institutional racism in policing. I was worried there for a second, glad we're back to the status quo.

...wat. This is actually a wake up call to remember to look at all the data before proceeding to a conclusion. Reading the thread is enlightening.
 

Chariot

Member
Oh cool, now we can ignore the rest of the institutional racism in policing. I was worried there for a second, glad we're back to the status quo.
Why do people keep saying that? Her action isn't resetting every effort made to improve society.
 
I finally got a chance to listen to the tape. My favorite part is at the end when the cop tells the boyfriend that he was in his shoes he'd already be gone.
 
Oh cool, now we can ignore the rest of the institutional racism in policing. I was worried there for a second, glad we're back to the status quo.

This thread isn't about institutional racism, which obviously exists (and is the main reason people were believing the worst when the news first came out...GAF is not filled with people defending the status quo, one of the best things about this forum). It's about one incident.
 

stufte

Member
Oh cool, now we can ignore the rest of the institutional racism in policing. I was worried there for a second, glad we're back to the status quo.

Is that how you're choosing to interpret this? No one is saying that this some how invalidates the reality of institutional racism...

These types of responses are why we all seem to have a hard time discussing things like this.
 
If this conversation wasn't recorded and we only had the cop's word - how would you respond to someone who said they didn't believe her story?

I said exactly what I would've said in your hypothetical in my first post here.

I had more questions than answers.

Oh cool, now we can ignore the rest of the institutional racism in policing. I was worried there for a second, glad we're back to the status quo.

How does this one instance invalidate anything?

You have an issue? Make a thread about institutional racism in police work and contribute an article.

Otherwise, drive by posting isn't welcome here. You make it worse.

I'm getting real tired of the snarky back handed one liners getting thrown around NeoGAF threads.
 
Oh cool, now we can ignore the rest of the institutional racism in policing. I was worried there for a second, glad we're back to the status quo.
I wouldn't go that far, but we can probably wait at least 24hrs before we grab our pitchforks and start asking for badges.
 

Sinatar

Official GAF Bottom Feeder
Oh cool, now we can ignore the rest of the institutional racism in policing. I was worried there for a second, glad we're back to the status quo.

9634708616_da67813fd5_o.gif
 
If this conversation wasn't recorded and we only had the cop's word - how would you respond to someone who said they didn't believe her story?

So we're going to go from "Police think every black person is breaking the law" to "Citizens think every police officer is a fascist bully", basically?
Oh cool, now we can ignore the rest of the institutional racism in policing. I was worried there for a second, glad we're back to the status quo.
Hmmm.
 
It is upsetting that some posters are so happy not that this was revealed not to be more police-served racism, but that they were right about not believing her. Like positively cooing with delight that they were right and others were wrong. Score one for devil's advocacy then
 
It is upsetting that some posters are so happy not that this was revealed not to be more police-served racism, but that they were right about not believing her. Like positively cooing with delight that they were right and others were wrong. Score one for devil's advocacy then

Please link me to the posts with this 'cooing.' I haven't seen a single one I'd describe like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom