Let Bish play Bish. You be Bobo. Unless Bish wants to let me play Bish too. Good lawd, how irresponsible would I be with that GAF power?
Well 720p vs 792p seems like a technicality. It's not like 720p vs 1080p
And isn't texture judgement subjective? Or did Respawn come out and say, "Oh yeah, for the final product we clicked the "add more texture box"?
I'm not baiting. I'm just trying to understand.
I assume Helios is getting the superior PC version of Titanfall. Because objectively it's the best version of the game.
Have you seen the 360 version yet?Xbox One version
Tesco promo code discount and most of my old clan mates are playing on it Plus, I like the level playing ground that playing on a controller brings.
Science.
And why do the 360 folks get none. Greedy bastard.
Have you seen the 360 version yet?
I think you forgot your and ®.
Its funny. In Titanfall for my Xbox one, the all-in-one entertainment system, i was too busy dodging bullets, parkouring, running around and killing other players to notice the graphics. Different priorities i guess.
Yeah and what if a person that worked for Sony came in and defended them?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=103653509&postcount=4897
Your point is a good one but if that Forza claim is true, I can't stop laughing.
Might as well revert to Halo 2 production values then. Cheaper to make, clearer to identify threats and 1080p60 4xMSAA+ assured for those that do notice or care about image quality.
Let Bish play Bish. You be Bobo. Unless Bish wants to let me play Bish too. Good lawd, how irresponsible would I be with that GAF power?
I'd have to see the context. Maybe it was like "I have this mysterious half smile on my face when playing Forza. Reminds me of the Mona Lisa".
For the record I think F5 looks nice enough for a launch game.
Damn!I've only seen what you all have.
You become Kanye!? EwwwWhen you become Bish I heard this happens
I think he was more specifically referring to the crowd, looking like the Mona Lisa.
I think he was more specifically referring to the crowd, looking like the Mona Lisa.
He actually forgot something else:
There hasn't been talk of the 360 version anything. We know almost literally nothing about it.Has there been any talk on the 360 version resolution?
There hasn't been talk of the 360 version anything. We know almost literally nothing about it.
yeah i wouldn't get your hopes up on the 360/ps3 version
yeah i wouldn't get your hopes up on the 360/ps3 version
yeah i wouldn't get your hopes up on the 360/ps3 version
Speaking of being suspicious, this poster joined early November and started posting on the eve of the Xbox One launch and compared Forza to the Mona Lisa in one post.
Yep, you got me. You cracked the code! I'm polishing Elop's boots with my saliva in between breaks where I gush about Microsoft games. Then I lurk in forums to tip the balance of internet thought. Then I spread message board lies about The Order 1886. Then I go home and eat a caviar omelet and sleep on a mattress full of sweet sweet MS money.
Yep, you got me. You cracked the code! I'm polishing Elop's boots with my saliva in between breaks where I gush about Microsoft games. Then I lurk in forums to tip the balance of internet thought. Then I spread message board lies about The Order 1886. Then I go home and eat a caviar omelet and sleep on a mattress full of sweet sweet MS money.
You definitely shouldn't get your hopes up for the PS3 version.Because there is no PS3 version.
Ps3 version?
Edit: I give up
You actually liking Polygon is a bigger flag than any of that.
Don't forget the Titanfall controller.
$120 vs $835
It still blows my mind people care sooo much that cboat was wrong about this. Much more important things.
Titanfall could be running at 4K and it would still be an ugly game. I honestly have no idea what you guys are fighting about.
I don't understand this. I see it about a lot of games that I think look good. What is it you are seeing that makes you say it looks bad? Are there not enough effects? Is it because it's not 1080p? Please help me understand why people keep saying this.Titanfall could be running at 4K and it would still be an ugly game. I honestly have no idea what you guys are fighting about.
It's true. I ran it at 5120x2880. It did not help 1 bit (well, AA was perfect)
I don't understand this. I see it about a lot of games that I think look good. What is it you are seeing that makes you say it looks bad? Are there not enough effects? Is it because it's not 1080p? Please help me understand why people keep saying this.
Titanfall's graphics have the same problem as CoD ports, which is that the textures don't have enough high frequency detail and the lighting looks flat. I usually end up using SweetFX when that happens, and it helps a bit.It's true. I ran it at 5120x2880. It did not help 1 bit (well, AA was perfect)
Read the OP.
The closed alpha had some pretty blah textures. Respawn responded after pics started leaking out that the textures would be improved in the final game. Cboat made a topic saying that the FINAL game would be 720p, and that respawn was lying about the texture bump for the final game.
The relatively open beta came around, and the textures were improved, and the game was running at >720p.
Cboat made another post after the beta was out, saying that the final game would be 720p with Alpha textures (and with broken party chat features), basically implying that Respawn was blowing smoke up everyone's asses.
This is the important part. He had an out after the beta, he could have chalked his earlier "rumor" up to old or outdated info, like most insiders do.
That is why he's getting the ban. He doubled down on a rumor in the face of indisputable evidence. Why he did so isn't important - whether it was straight up malice or a really bad source, we can't have our credible insiders posting outright misleading information as "fact", misinforming hundreds of members of our community and potentially harming the credibility of developers who post here publicly. Cboat obviously is an insider, no one could know some of the things he has posted if he wasn't, but there is a certain responsibility that comes with having information, and it seems that as of late he has lost sight of that. Having spent years building up a solid reputation, some of his last few misses have been pretty big (ass-storm included), because a portion of the community regards his words as fact.
I don't understand this. I see it about a lot of games that I think look good. What is it you are seeing that makes you say it looks bad? Are there not enough effects? Is it because it's not 1080p? Please help me understand why people keep saying this.
I understand it looks dated. It has a feel of last gen games. I thought they looked pretty good toward the end though. Like gta v looked great to me. So when people say it looks terrible, they really are just expressing discontent at the lack of being better than last gen? Because I didn't think last gen was so bad...Titanfall is a fun game where the graphics are merely serviceable at best. Geometry, foliage, texture resolution, lighting, etc etc.... it's all very dated.
I wouldn't say it's a BAD looking game, but it's not going to win any awards. But that won't stop me from playing it a ton more than far better looking games.
Serviceable is also how I would describe them. The maps and environments also feel a lot more "alive" than traditional MP shooters, there's more going on in the background.Titanfall is a fun game where the graphics are merely serviceable at best. Geometry, foliage, texture resolution, lighting, etc etc.... it's all very dated.
I wouldn't say it's a BAD looking game, but it's not going to win any awards. But that won't stop me from playing it a ton more than far better looking games.
792p?
Whats up with all these weird resolutions.
I feel there's no way to know if cboat was right and then they upgraded to 792... 720 to 792 is not unheard of bump in res
He specifically said "792p? no. 720".
Dude was just dead wrong on everything he said about titanfall. Even the mapcount.