A Link to the Past
Banned
I welcome Tubman on a coin or a bill, but replace Hamilton, not Jackson, if someone needs to be replaced. Jackson at least tried to kill the seed of what is now the Fed.
Jackson was a shithead
I welcome Tubman on a coin or a bill, but replace Hamilton, not Jackson, if someone needs to be replaced. Jackson at least tried to kill the seed of what is now the Fed.
I welcome Tubman on a coin or a bill, but replace Hamilton, not Jackson, if someone needs to be replaced. Jackson at least tried to kill the seed of what is now the Fed.
Eh, we've had some really bad ones. Andrew Johnson (Fuck Andrew Johnson) and James Buchanan come to mind. A reverse shit sandwich for Lincoln if you will.Jackson was easily the worst president we ever had, but I shouldn't be shocked at your reaction here either.
Even though I hate carrying cash on me, and always take it to the bank when it is given to me, truly there is a need for it, and in some situations, I deal exclusively in cash, because it works better for those situations.Pretty cool, although the trend of moving away from physical currency in the past decade or two makes design changes like this and here in Canada seem sort of irrelevant in the long term. It's all about debit and credit cards, electronic tipping, cell-phone banking, etc.
Eh, we've had some really bad ones. Andrew Johnson (Fuck Andrew Johnson) and James Buchanan come to mind.
Even though I hate carrying cash on me, and always take it to the bank when it is given to me, truly there is a need for it, and in some situations, I deal exclusively in cash, because it works better for those situations.
I'm no Jackson fan, and I'm fine with taking him off the currency, but it's simply incorrect to state that past positive views of Jackson were built on Indian removal. He was celebrated by the Democrats as a war hero and a groundbreaking populist -- Wilson and FDR's supporters built him up as the forerunner of their idols' battles against the moneyed classes (see, e.g., Arthur Schlesinger Jr.'s Pulitzer Prize-winning The Age of Jackson).Jackson is on our currency for the genocide of native americans and taking over their terriritory.
Remember this is 1928 we're talking about here when they made the decision to put him on the $20. That's a time when Wild West traveling shows and silent films were very popularly depicting heroic white people setting up camp in the wild (ie not yet fully claimed) west defending themselves from the native savages.
Some of you guys think they thought Jackson was flawed because of the trail of tears, but decided to put him on there anyway because he killed the second national bank, started the idea of the president fully exercising veto powers, and forced North Carolina to pay their tariff taxes?
No, they put him on the currency because he was key in securing american land from the native americans.
Eh, we've had some really bad ones. Andrew Johnson (Fuck Andrew Johnson) and James Buchanan come to mind.
Also, Jackson isnt getting completely booted off the $20 bill. Hes likely to remain on the back.
Well yeah...
No shocked that HUELEN10 would stan for a racist.
I usually keep about $100 in my slim wallet. Right now I'd have three Tubmans on me.
I like the idea of rotating the people on the bills. I also think Tubman is a great American to memorialize there for some time.
You know you're silly when you're the inspiration for one of Frank Underwood's plans in House of Cards.Also Buchanan, for all the terrible suffering he caused, never fails to make me laugh with his scheme to distract the nation from the looming crisis of slavery by launching a war on Utah. That has to be the most insane scheme of any president, and so he gets a bump for entertainment value in my estimation.
So we gonna have one side against slavery and the other side for racism?It looks like Jackson is *NOT* getting removed from the bill.
From the link in the OP:
"Your money's no good here"
It looks like Jackson is *NOT* getting removed from the bill.
From the link in the OP:
So we gonna have one side against slavery and the other side for racism?
It looks like Jackson is *NOT* getting removed from the bill.
From the link in the OP:
Not shocked that HUELEN10 would stan for a racist.
Yes. We keep racism in the butt..the back of the bill, if you will. A hero is spared!We are against racism. But....
The contradiction in the very first sentence of that post hurt so much I couldn't continue.
We are against racism. But....
Jackson was easily the worst president we ever had, but I shouldn't be shocked at your reaction here either.
Tubman is fine.
Still think Ike should be on a bill. And before JFK too.
Franklin and Elanor Roosevelt should probably be on bills too.
Billy Mabray ‏@billygoat 36m36 minutes ago
I feel so bad for Andrew Jackson, being forced to relocate by the federal government. Must be terrible for him.
Franklin and Elanor Roosevelt should probably be on bills too.
UMM...
UMM...
Jackson was easily the worst president we ever had, but I shouldn't be shocked at your reaction here either.
Well of course I know FDR, he is one of my favorite historical figures, and you're damned right he deserves to be on the bill. When you said Franklin, and we're talking about bills here, well, we already have Franklin. And yes, i've been hyping up Eleanor for a while now.I can't do it, I just can't deal with you anymore. Do you really not know FDR's full name?
Nice try, but Federal Reserve Notes are legal tender for ALL debts, public and private.
Loved this tweet.
I mean. He easily was not. Hes rated pretty highly by historians. You should read up on american history.
I'm no Jackson fan, and I'm fine with taking him off the currency, but it's simply incorrect to state that past positive views of Jackson were built on Indian removal. He was celebrated by the Democrats as a war hero and a groundbreaking populist -- Wilson and FDR's supporters built him up as the forerunner of their idols' battles against the moneyed classes (see, e.g., Arthur Schlesinger Jr.'s Pulitzer Prize-winning The Age of Jackson).
For what, presiding over a genocide? Historical opinion on him has turned in the last few decades.